Breaking camouflage: Binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images

Susan G. Wardle, John Cass, Kevin R. Brooks, David Alais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Visual overlay masking is typically studied with a mask and target located at the same depth plane. Masking is reduced when binocular disparity separates the target from the mask (G. Moraglia & B. Schneider, 1990). We replicate this nding for a broadband target masked by natural images and nd the greatest masking (threshold elevation) when target and mask occupy the same depth plane. Masking was reduced equally whether the target appeared at a crossed or an uncrossed disparity. We measure the tuning of masking and determine the extent of the benet afforded by disparity. Threshold elevation decreases monotonically with increasing disparity until ± 8 arcmin. Two underlying components to the masking are evident; one accounts for around two-thirds of the masking and is independent of disparity. The second component is disparity-dependent and results in additional masking when there is zero disparity. Importantly, the reduction in masking with disparity cannot be explained by interocular decorrelation; we use a single-interval orientation discrimination task to exclude this possibility. We conclude that when the target and mask are presented at different depths they activate distinct populations of disparity-tuned neurons, resulting in less masking of the target.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume10
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Vision Disparity
Masks
Neurons
Population

Cite this

Wardle, Susan G. ; Cass, John ; Brooks, Kevin R. ; Alais, David. / Breaking camouflage : Binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images. In: Journal of Vision. 2010 ; Vol. 10, No. 14. pp. 1-12.
@article{3527e9733192419787f6123d354bd76a,
title = "Breaking camouflage: Binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images",
abstract = "Visual overlay masking is typically studied with a mask and target located at the same depth plane. Masking is reduced when binocular disparity separates the target from the mask (G. Moraglia & B. Schneider, 1990). We replicate this nding for a broadband target masked by natural images and nd the greatest masking (threshold elevation) when target and mask occupy the same depth plane. Masking was reduced equally whether the target appeared at a crossed or an uncrossed disparity. We measure the tuning of masking and determine the extent of the benet afforded by disparity. Threshold elevation decreases monotonically with increasing disparity until ± 8 arcmin. Two underlying components to the masking are evident; one accounts for around two-thirds of the masking and is independent of disparity. The second component is disparity-dependent and results in additional masking when there is zero disparity. Importantly, the reduction in masking with disparity cannot be explained by interocular decorrelation; we use a single-interval orientation discrimination task to exclude this possibility. We conclude that when the target and mask are presented at different depths they activate distinct populations of disparity-tuned neurons, resulting in less masking of the target.",
author = "Wardle, {Susan G.} and John Cass and Brooks, {Kevin R.} and David Alais",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1167/10.14.1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)",
number = "14",

}

Breaking camouflage : Binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images. / Wardle, Susan G.; Cass, John; Brooks, Kevin R.; Alais, David.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 10, No. 14, 2010, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breaking camouflage

T2 - Journal of Vision

AU - Wardle, Susan G.

AU - Cass, John

AU - Brooks, Kevin R.

AU - Alais, David

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Visual overlay masking is typically studied with a mask and target located at the same depth plane. Masking is reduced when binocular disparity separates the target from the mask (G. Moraglia & B. Schneider, 1990). We replicate this nding for a broadband target masked by natural images and nd the greatest masking (threshold elevation) when target and mask occupy the same depth plane. Masking was reduced equally whether the target appeared at a crossed or an uncrossed disparity. We measure the tuning of masking and determine the extent of the benet afforded by disparity. Threshold elevation decreases monotonically with increasing disparity until ± 8 arcmin. Two underlying components to the masking are evident; one accounts for around two-thirds of the masking and is independent of disparity. The second component is disparity-dependent and results in additional masking when there is zero disparity. Importantly, the reduction in masking with disparity cannot be explained by interocular decorrelation; we use a single-interval orientation discrimination task to exclude this possibility. We conclude that when the target and mask are presented at different depths they activate distinct populations of disparity-tuned neurons, resulting in less masking of the target.

AB - Visual overlay masking is typically studied with a mask and target located at the same depth plane. Masking is reduced when binocular disparity separates the target from the mask (G. Moraglia & B. Schneider, 1990). We replicate this nding for a broadband target masked by natural images and nd the greatest masking (threshold elevation) when target and mask occupy the same depth plane. Masking was reduced equally whether the target appeared at a crossed or an uncrossed disparity. We measure the tuning of masking and determine the extent of the benet afforded by disparity. Threshold elevation decreases monotonically with increasing disparity until ± 8 arcmin. Two underlying components to the masking are evident; one accounts for around two-thirds of the masking and is independent of disparity. The second component is disparity-dependent and results in additional masking when there is zero disparity. Importantly, the reduction in masking with disparity cannot be explained by interocular decorrelation; we use a single-interval orientation discrimination task to exclude this possibility. We conclude that when the target and mask are presented at different depths they activate distinct populations of disparity-tuned neurons, resulting in less masking of the target.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251585259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/10.14.1

DO - 10.1167/10.14.1

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 14

ER -