Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bringing Uncle Chatty Gee (ChatGPT) into the classroom: a lens from Critical Indigenous Studies

Tamika Worrell*, Zac Roberts

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article critically examines the integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as “Uncle Chatty Gee” (ChatGPT), within tertiary Indigenous Studies classrooms, using a Critical Indigenous Studies lens. It highlights the risks posed by AI to Indigenous knowledges, pedagogies, and cultures, including issues of inaccuracy, the misappropriation and homogenisation of Indigenous identities, and the perpetuation of settler-colonial biases. Drawing on our professional practice, we present three classroom case studies, illustrating strategies to stimulate ethical reflection, student collaboration, and critical engagement with Indigenous content while navigating the environmental and social harms of AI. We emphasise the irreplaceable value of genuine transformation, creativity, and relationality in Indigenous education, arguing that these outcomes cannot be meaningfully replicated by AI-generated outputs. Recommendations include fostering critical AI literacy, centring Indigenous voices and sovereignty, and developing teaching practices that resist punitive approaches while equipping students to challenge technological harms. Ultimately, this research advocates for Indigenous-led educational futures in which digital tools are engaged thoughtfully, with a commitment to transformative and culturally safe learning environments.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalCurriculum Perspectives
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 May 2026

Keywords

  • Chat GPT
  • Classroom practice
  • Generative AI
  • Higher education
  • Indigenous studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bringing Uncle Chatty Gee (ChatGPT) into the classroom: a lens from Critical Indigenous Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this