British 'post-conflict' operations in Iraq

into the heart of strategic darkness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

British forces have long held what may be seen as an enviable, if controversial, record in defeating insurgents around the globe. From Malaya, through Aden to Ireland, British troops have largely been seen as 'successful'. Iraq however threatens to compromise this reputation. The insurgency remains intense, civil war threatens to engulf the country, British troops are dying in numbers and some troops have been accused of war crimes. How are we to explain the failures in Iraq? In this article I offer a version of events based on a Clausewitzian framework. I demonstrate that British troops in Iraq are deployed in a 'strategic void' as a result of political failures in both the UK and US, which means troops are compromised, vulnerable and strategically aimless. Their actions are crucially detached from higher political objectives. Failure to heed Clausewitz's admonitions has led to a situation in which British 'strategy' amounts to hope, wait and see, while British troops fight, do and die.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-86
Number of pages26
JournalCivil Wars
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'British 'post-conflict' operations in Iraq: into the heart of strategic darkness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this