Bureaucratic Politics, Role Conflict, and the Internal Dynamics of US Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan

Conor Keane, Steve Wood*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Among the many challenges confronting the United States and its allies in Afghanistan were cohesion and communication problems in state-building programs. Merging role theory and bureaucratic politics approaches, this article argues that US Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs), the composite groups charged with implementing these programs, suffered from incompatibilities between sectors of government, among which the military was dominant. US PRTs were affected by role conflict, resulting from varying and often competing organizational cultures with divergent role conceptions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)99-118
    Number of pages20
    JournalArmed Forces and Society
    Volume42
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bureaucratic Politics, Role Conflict, and the Internal Dynamics of US Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this