TY - JOUR
T1 - Can progressive and non-progressive behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia be distinguished at presentation?
AU - Hornberger, M.
AU - Shelley, B. P.
AU - Kipps, C. M.
AU - Piguet, O.
AU - Hodges, J. R.
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - Background: Recent findings suggest that patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) differ in their disease progression (progressive vs nonprogressive patients). The current study investigates whether the two groups can be discriminated by their clinical features at first presentation. Methods: Archival clinical data of the Early Onset Dementia Clinic, Cambridge, UK, were analysed for 71 patients with bv-FTD: 45 progressive and 26 nonprogressive cases with more than 3 years of follow-up. Results: The subgroups were largely indistinguishable on the basis of the presenting clinical features but could be distinguished on general cognitive (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-revised) and selected supportive diagnostic features (distractibility, stereotypic speech, impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) and current depression). Conclusions: Progressive and non-progressive patients are difficult to differentiate on the basis of current clinical diagnostic criteria for FTD but a combination of general cognitive, executive dysfunction and impaired ADL measures appear to be the most promising discriminators.
AB - Background: Recent findings suggest that patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) differ in their disease progression (progressive vs nonprogressive patients). The current study investigates whether the two groups can be discriminated by their clinical features at first presentation. Methods: Archival clinical data of the Early Onset Dementia Clinic, Cambridge, UK, were analysed for 71 patients with bv-FTD: 45 progressive and 26 nonprogressive cases with more than 3 years of follow-up. Results: The subgroups were largely indistinguishable on the basis of the presenting clinical features but could be distinguished on general cognitive (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-revised) and selected supportive diagnostic features (distractibility, stereotypic speech, impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) and current depression). Conclusions: Progressive and non-progressive patients are difficult to differentiate on the basis of current clinical diagnostic criteria for FTD but a combination of general cognitive, executive dysfunction and impaired ADL measures appear to be the most promising discriminators.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66149095475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jnnp.2008.163873
DO - 10.1136/jnnp.2008.163873
M3 - Article
C2 - 19228667
AN - SCOPUS:66149095475
SN - 0022-3050
VL - 80
SP - 591
EP - 593
JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -