Abstract
The purpose of this study was twofold; first, to identify Australian and Canadian pre-service teachers' use, confidence and success in various behaviour management strategies, and second, to identify significant differences between the two cohorts. Pooled data indicated that pre-service teachers most frequently employ low level corrective strategies, such as non-verbal body language, rather than strategies that serve to prevent student misbehaviour. The strategies pre-service teachers report most frequently employing were also those they felt most confident in. Australian pre-service teachers employ rewards significantly more, while Canadian pre-service teachers utilise preventative and differentiation strategies significantly more. Differences might be accounted for by the timing of pre-service teachers' school practicum. Implications for teacher education programs and future research conclude the paper.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 271-281 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Journal of Educational Research |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Australia
- Behaviour management
- Canada
- Pre-service teachers
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Canadian and Australian pre-service teachers' use, confidence and success in various behaviour management strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver