Abstract
The high levels of cross border transactions in Australia, caused partly by its federated nature, make the intersection between domestic civil procedure and private international law significant. Australian courts, therefore, must be cautious of the precedent they create for cross border strategic litigators in making case management decisions on cross border cases. This paper considers the dangers of taking a purely domestic case management based approach to private international law disputes in light of the High Court’s recent decision in UBS AG v Tyne [2018] HCA 45.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Civil Justice Research Conference 2019 - programme |
Publisher | Macquarie University |
Number of pages | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 21 Feb 2019 |
Event | Civil Justice Research Conference 2019 - Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia Duration: 21 Feb 2019 → 22 Feb 2019 |
Conference
Conference | Civil Justice Research Conference 2019 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Australia |
City | Sydney |
Period | 21/02/19 → 22/02/19 |