Categories and range effects in human spatial memory

Ken Cheng, Marcia L. Spetch, Andros Hoan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

After learning a particular target stimulus, such as a location, humans' judgments of whether a particular stimulus is the target or not is affected by the range of stimuli presented on tests. In such frequently found range effects, the peak of "yes" responses shifts toward the middle of the range of tested stimuli. Humans also code both the metric value and categorical information regarding a target stimulus, and use both forms of codes, such that responses are biased toward the category middle (category adjustment model, Duffy et al., 2010). Categorical codes should also affect range effects, with a test range crossing category boundaries producing less range effect than a test range within a category. We examined a set of past results presented in a review of range effects in humans (Thomas, 1993) for functional explanations in light of categorical coding, and found that all results could be reasonably explained. Additional experiments comparing range effects across vs. within a category found limited supporting evidence, perhaps because the range effects were weak. The adaptive functions of using (in part) categorical coding accounts for many seemingly peculiar biases in human cognition.

LanguageEnglish
Article numberArticle 231
Pages1-12
Number of pages12
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume1
Issue numberDEC
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Cognition
Learning
Spatial Memory

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author/s. This Document is protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.

Keywords

  • range effect
  • category
  • category adjustment model
  • spatial memory
  • human

Cite this

Cheng, Ken ; Spetch, Marcia L. ; Hoan, Andros. / Categories and range effects in human spatial memory. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2010 ; Vol. 1, No. DEC. pp. 1-12.
@article{98f40114827b43d99a1719e8cc3f999d,
title = "Categories and range effects in human spatial memory",
abstract = "After learning a particular target stimulus, such as a location, humans' judgments of whether a particular stimulus is the target or not is affected by the range of stimuli presented on tests. In such frequently found range effects, the peak of {"}yes{"} responses shifts toward the middle of the range of tested stimuli. Humans also code both the metric value and categorical information regarding a target stimulus, and use both forms of codes, such that responses are biased toward the category middle (category adjustment model, Duffy et al., 2010). Categorical codes should also affect range effects, with a test range crossing category boundaries producing less range effect than a test range within a category. We examined a set of past results presented in a review of range effects in humans (Thomas, 1993) for functional explanations in light of categorical coding, and found that all results could be reasonably explained. Additional experiments comparing range effects across vs. within a category found limited supporting evidence, perhaps because the range effects were weak. The adaptive functions of using (in part) categorical coding accounts for many seemingly peculiar biases in human cognition.",
keywords = "range effect, category, category adjustment model, spatial memory, human",
author = "Ken Cheng and Spetch, {Marcia L.} and Andros Hoan",
note = "Copyright the Author/s. This Document is protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00231",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
number = "DEC",

}

Categories and range effects in human spatial memory. / Cheng, Ken; Spetch, Marcia L.; Hoan, Andros.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 1, No. DEC, Article 231, 2010, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Categories and range effects in human spatial memory

AU - Cheng, Ken

AU - Spetch, Marcia L.

AU - Hoan, Andros

N1 - Copyright the Author/s. This Document is protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - After learning a particular target stimulus, such as a location, humans' judgments of whether a particular stimulus is the target or not is affected by the range of stimuli presented on tests. In such frequently found range effects, the peak of "yes" responses shifts toward the middle of the range of tested stimuli. Humans also code both the metric value and categorical information regarding a target stimulus, and use both forms of codes, such that responses are biased toward the category middle (category adjustment model, Duffy et al., 2010). Categorical codes should also affect range effects, with a test range crossing category boundaries producing less range effect than a test range within a category. We examined a set of past results presented in a review of range effects in humans (Thomas, 1993) for functional explanations in light of categorical coding, and found that all results could be reasonably explained. Additional experiments comparing range effects across vs. within a category found limited supporting evidence, perhaps because the range effects were weak. The adaptive functions of using (in part) categorical coding accounts for many seemingly peculiar biases in human cognition.

AB - After learning a particular target stimulus, such as a location, humans' judgments of whether a particular stimulus is the target or not is affected by the range of stimuli presented on tests. In such frequently found range effects, the peak of "yes" responses shifts toward the middle of the range of tested stimuli. Humans also code both the metric value and categorical information regarding a target stimulus, and use both forms of codes, such that responses are biased toward the category middle (category adjustment model, Duffy et al., 2010). Categorical codes should also affect range effects, with a test range crossing category boundaries producing less range effect than a test range within a category. We examined a set of past results presented in a review of range effects in humans (Thomas, 1993) for functional explanations in light of categorical coding, and found that all results could be reasonably explained. Additional experiments comparing range effects across vs. within a category found limited supporting evidence, perhaps because the range effects were weak. The adaptive functions of using (in part) categorical coding accounts for many seemingly peculiar biases in human cognition.

KW - range effect

KW - category

KW - category adjustment model

KW - spatial memory

KW - human

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855196322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00231

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00231

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

T2 - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - DEC

M1 - Article 231

ER -