Centre partnerships through a Singaporean lens: the role of mothers, fathers, grandparents, and domestic helpers

Parental involvement, engagement, and partnerships have been of considerable interest to policy makers and scholars in the field of education since the 1960s. Research began identifying achievement gaps based on social class and cultural background, particularly in the United States (Fan & Chen, 2001; Lehrer & Bastien, 2015), and associated parental involvement in children’s education, both in school and at home, with children’s success in school and in life (e.g., Barnard, 2004; Chan & Ritchie, 2016; Carter, 2002; Epstein, 1995; Epstein & Salinas, 2004; Fan & Chen, 2001). We argue that the discourse of parent involvement is part of a larger neoliberal economic rationale for early childhood education and care (ECEC), and that relationships with families are instrumentalized as a means to ensure children’s educational success, instead of focusing on meaningful relationships between ECEC professionals and parents in the present moment. Too often, the focus in research and policy is on how partnerships with families serve the child’s future interests in order to ensure that he or she will be a contributing asset to society and the economy. This introduction will set the stage for the chapters that follow by deconstructing the instrumentalized role of parents in ECEC within neoliberal states as well as the marginalization and exclusion of parents and families who choose not to or cannot meet externally imposed expectations, or whose cultural values include different visions of their own and educators’ roles. The following chapters illustrate some possible alternatives to the instrumentalized role of parents and families, focusing on ethical, social, and rights-based rationales for engaging with families.