CEO performance targets: The impact of Big 4 accounting firms versus other compensation consultants

Rebecca L. Bachmann*, Sameera Rasool, Helen Spiropoulos

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using a sample of ASX 500 firms over the 2005–2019 period, we document substantial variation in the use of performance targets within Chief Executive Officer (CEO) compensation contracts, contrasting firms advised by Big 4 accounting entities with other compensation consulting firms. Firms that engage a Big 4 accounting firm are more likely to implement explicit non-financial performance targets within the short-term incentive plan, effectively minimising opportunities for post hoc justification. They also favour the incorporation of relative performance targets that mitigate pay for luck in the long-term incentive plan. Firms that engage a Big 4 accounting firm demonstrate a similar pay-for-performance relation to firms that do not engage a compensation consultant, while firms engaging non-Big 4 consultants exhibit a lower pay-for-performance relation. Our findings suggest that Big 4 accounting firms provide compensation recommendations that encourage the alignment of interests between managers and shareholders.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralian Journal of Management
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Oct 2024

Cite this