Abstract
In this study, we approach the problem of distinguishing general profanity from hate speech in social media, something which has not been widely considered. Using a new dataset annotated specifically for this task, we employ supervised classification along with a set of features that includes n-grams, skip-grams and clustering-based word representations. We apply approaches based on single classifiers as well as more advanced ensemble classifiers and stacked generalisation, achieving the best result of 80% accuracy for this 3-class classification task. Analysis of the results reveals that discriminating hate speech and profanity is not a simple task, which may require features that capture a deeper understanding of the text not always possible with surface n-grams. The variability of gold labels in the annotated data, due to differences in the subjective adjudications of the annotators, is also an issue. Other directions for future work are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 187-202 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Mar 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- bullying
- classifier ensembles
- Hate speech
- social media
- text classification
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges in discriminating profanity from hate speech'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver