TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges of recruiting emergency department patients to a qualitative study
T2 - a thematic analysis of researchers' experiences
AU - Price, Delyth
AU - Edwards, Michelle
AU - Carson-Stevens, Andrew
AU - Cooper, Alison
AU - Davies, Freya
AU - Evans, Bridie
AU - Hibbert, Peter
AU - Hughes, Thomas
AU - Rainer, Tim
AU - Siriwardena, Niro
AU - Edwards, Adrian
N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.
PY - 2020/6/11
Y1 - 2020/6/11
N2 - Background: At times of increasing pressure on emergency departments, and the need for research into different models of service delivery, little is known about how to recruit patients for qualitative research in emergency departments. We report from one study which aimed to collect evidence on patients' experiences of attending emergency departments with different models of using general practitioners, but faced challenges in recruiting patients. This paper aims to identify and reflect on the challenges faced at all stages of patient recruitment, from identifying and inviting eligible patients, consenting them for participation and finally to engaging them in interviews, and make recommendations based on our learning. Methods: A thematic analysis was carried out on field-notes taken during research visits and meeting minutes of discussions to review and improve patient recruitment throughout the study. Results: The following factors influenced the success of patient recruitment in the emergency department setting: complicated or time-consuming electronic health record systems for identifying patients; narrow participant eligibility criteria; limited research nurse support; and lack of face-to-face communication between researchers and eligible patients. Conclusions: This paper adds to the methodological evidence for improving patient recruitment in different settings, with a focus on qualitative research in emergency departments. Our findings have implications for future studies attempting to recruit patients in similar settings.
AB - Background: At times of increasing pressure on emergency departments, and the need for research into different models of service delivery, little is known about how to recruit patients for qualitative research in emergency departments. We report from one study which aimed to collect evidence on patients' experiences of attending emergency departments with different models of using general practitioners, but faced challenges in recruiting patients. This paper aims to identify and reflect on the challenges faced at all stages of patient recruitment, from identifying and inviting eligible patients, consenting them for participation and finally to engaging them in interviews, and make recommendations based on our learning. Methods: A thematic analysis was carried out on field-notes taken during research visits and meeting minutes of discussions to review and improve patient recruitment throughout the study. Results: The following factors influenced the success of patient recruitment in the emergency department setting: complicated or time-consuming electronic health record systems for identifying patients; narrow participant eligibility criteria; limited research nurse support; and lack of face-to-face communication between researchers and eligible patients. Conclusions: This paper adds to the methodological evidence for improving patient recruitment in different settings, with a focus on qualitative research in emergency departments. Our findings have implications for future studies attempting to recruit patients in similar settings.
KW - Emergency department
KW - Patient experience
KW - Patient recruitment challenges
KW - Qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086355092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12874-020-01039-2
DO - 10.1186/s12874-020-01039-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 32522265
AN - SCOPUS:85086355092
SN - 1471-2288
VL - 20
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology
JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology
IS - 1
M1 - 151
ER -