TY - JOUR
T1 - Children and refusal of medical treatment
T2 - in urgent need of reform.
AU - Lennings, Nicholas
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - The ability of children to refuse medical treatment is far from certain. The New South Wales Law Reform Commission report on this topic, released in 2008, addressed a number of key concerns. As yet, no action on that report has been taken. Neither the present statutory nor common law regime provides sufficient guidance on this issue. The case of Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112, while important, is not as far-reaching as it first appeared and has been subject to substantial limitations regarding refusals of treatment. Specifically, the position in relation to the assessment of competency, and the weight of a competent decision, remains outstanding. The ability of children to refuse medical treatment is in urgent need of attention and rectification.
AB - The ability of children to refuse medical treatment is far from certain. The New South Wales Law Reform Commission report on this topic, released in 2008, addressed a number of key concerns. As yet, no action on that report has been taken. Neither the present statutory nor common law regime provides sufficient guidance on this issue. The case of Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112, while important, is not as far-reaching as it first appeared and has been subject to substantial limitations regarding refusals of treatment. Specifically, the position in relation to the assessment of competency, and the weight of a competent decision, remains outstanding. The ability of children to refuse medical treatment is in urgent need of attention and rectification.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891638480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 24218787
AN - SCOPUS:84891638480
SN - 1320-159X
VL - 21
SP - 122
EP - 141
JO - Journal of Law and Medicine
JF - Journal of Law and Medicine
IS - 1
ER -