Children's categorization and evaluation of different types of lies and truths

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    148 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study investigated the ability of children from three age groups (4, 8, and 11 years of age; N = 72) to categorize three different types of intentionally false and true statements as lies and truths, and also measured their evaluation of such statements. Results revealed that the older children were more likely to categorize false statements as lies and true statments as truths than were the 4-year-olds. all children evaluated telling lies as worse than telling truths. Antisocial lies were rated as the most serious lie type and "white lies" as the least serious. Anticipated regulatory control was more advanced for the 8-and 11-year-olds, who expected both self-approval for truth-telling and self-disapproval for lying for two of the three truth and lie types; the younger children did not anticipate greater self-approval for truth-teeling and self-dispproval for lying for any of the truth and lie types.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1338-1347
    Number of pages10
    JournalChild Development
    Volume70
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Children's categorization and evaluation of different types of lies and truths'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this