Cinema as a representational art

Catharine Abell*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I develop a unified account of cinematic representation as primary depiction. On this account, cinematic representation is a distinctive form of depiction, unique in its capacity to depict temporal properties. I then explore the consequences of this account for the much-contested question of whether cinema is an independent representational art form. I show that it is, and that Scruton ' s argument to the contrary relies on an erroneous conception of cinematic representation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-286
Number of pages14
JournalBritish Journal of Aesthetics
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cinema as a representational art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this