Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Circulating tumor DNA-guided adjuvant therapy in locally advanced colon cancer: the randomized phase 2/3 DYNAMIC-III trial

Jeanne Tie*, Yuxuan Wang, Jonathan M. Loree, Joshua D. Cohen, Rachel Wong, Tim Price, Niall C. Tebbutt, Val Gebski, David Espinoza, Matthew Burge, Sam Harris, James Lynam, Belinda Lee, Margaret M. Lee, Daniel Breadner, Marlyse Debrincat, Siavash Foroughi, Lorraine Chantrill, Stephanie H. Lim, Sharlene GillChris O’Callaghan, Janine Ptak, Natalie Silliman, Lisa Dobbyn, Maria Popoli, Chetan Bettegowda, Nicholas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein, Peter Gibbs, AGITG DYNAMIC-III Study Group (Intergroup Study of the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group and Canadian Cancer Trials Group), Australasia Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, Canadian Cancer Trials Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer provides uncertain benefit at the individual level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help refine risk-adjusted treatment selection. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 trial, patients with stage III colon cancer underwent ctDNA testing 5–6 weeks after surgery and were assigned (1:1) to ctDNA-guided or standard management. In the ctDNA-guided arm, patients negative for ctDNA received de-escalated therapy, whereas ctDNA-positive patients received escalated therapy. Clinicians prespecified the standard regimen. Primary endpoints were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ctDNA-negative patients and 2-year RFS for ctDNA-positive patients. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related hospitalization and ctDNA clearance. Among 968 evaluable patients, 702 (72.5%) were ctDNA negative. With a median follow-up of 47 months, ctDNA-negative patients experienced significantly fewer recurrences than ctDNA-positive patients (3-year RFS 87% versus 49%; P < 0.001). In ctDNA-negative patients, de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin use (34.8% versus 88.6%) and hospitalizations (8.5% versus 13.2%) but yielded slightly lower RFS than standard management (85.3% versus 88.1%), not meeting the non-inferiority margin. In ctDNA-positive patients, higher ctDNA burden correlated with recurrence risk (3-year RFS 77% to 23% across quartiles; P < 0.001). Escalated therapy did not improve outcomes over standard management (2-year RFS 51% versus 61%). There was no unexpected toxicity. Persistent ctDNA after treatment predicted markedly worse prognosis (3-year RFS 14% versus 79%). ctDNA is validated as a strong prognostic classifier. ctDNA-guided de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin exposure and adverse events with outcomes approaching standard of care, whereas exploratory chemotherapy intensification conferred no RFS benefit, suggesting a need for novel strategies in ctDNA-positive disease. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12617001566325.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4291-4300
Number of pages24
JournalNature Medicine
Volume31
Issue number12
Early online date20 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Circulating tumor DNA-guided adjuvant therapy in locally advanced colon cancer: the randomized phase 2/3 DYNAMIC-III trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this