Citations alone were enough to predict favorable conclusions in reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors

Xujuan Zhou, Ying Wang, Guy Tsafnat, Enrico Coiera, Florence T. Bourgeois, Adam G. Dunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Study Design and Setting Reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors published during January 2005 to May 2013 were identified by searching PubMed. In a blinded evaluation, the reviews were classified as favorable if investigators agreed that they supported the use of neuraminidase inhibitors for prophylaxis or treatment of influenza. Reference lists were used to identify all unique citations to primary articles. Three classification methods were tested for their ability to predict favorable conclusions using only citation information.

Objectives To examine the use of supervised machine learning to identify biases in evidence selection and determine if citation information can predict favorable conclusions in reviews about neuraminidase inhibitors.

Results Citations to 4,574 articles were identified in 152 reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors, and 93 (61%) of these reviews were graded as favorable. Primary articles describing drug resistance were among the citations that were underrepresented in favorable reviews. The most accurate classifier predicted favorable conclusions with 96.2% accuracy, using citations to only 24 of 4,574 articles.

Conclusion Favorable conclusions in reviews about neuraminidase inhibitors can be predicted using only information about the articles they cite. The approach highlights how evidence exclusion shapes conclusions in reviews and provides a method to evaluate citation practices in a corpus of reviews.

LanguageEnglish
Pages87-93
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neuraminidase
Drug Resistance
PubMed
Human Influenza
Research Personnel

Cite this

@article{8b491e8486c04ea6a91c5706de2f02de,
title = "Citations alone were enough to predict favorable conclusions in reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors",
abstract = "Study Design and Setting Reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors published during January 2005 to May 2013 were identified by searching PubMed. In a blinded evaluation, the reviews were classified as favorable if investigators agreed that they supported the use of neuraminidase inhibitors for prophylaxis or treatment of influenza. Reference lists were used to identify all unique citations to primary articles. Three classification methods were tested for their ability to predict favorable conclusions using only citation information.Objectives To examine the use of supervised machine learning to identify biases in evidence selection and determine if citation information can predict favorable conclusions in reviews about neuraminidase inhibitors.Results Citations to 4,574 articles were identified in 152 reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors, and 93 (61{\%}) of these reviews were graded as favorable. Primary articles describing drug resistance were among the citations that were underrepresented in favorable reviews. The most accurate classifier predicted favorable conclusions with 96.2{\%} accuracy, using citations to only 24 of 4,574 articles.Conclusion Favorable conclusions in reviews about neuraminidase inhibitors can be predicted using only information about the articles they cite. The approach highlights how evidence exclusion shapes conclusions in reviews and provides a method to evaluate citation practices in a corpus of reviews.",
author = "Xujuan Zhou and Ying Wang and Guy Tsafnat and Enrico Coiera and Bourgeois, {Florence T.} and Dunn, {Adam G.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.014",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "87--93",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Citations alone were enough to predict favorable conclusions in reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors. / Zhou, Xujuan; Wang, Ying; Tsafnat, Guy; Coiera, Enrico; Bourgeois, Florence T.; Dunn, Adam G.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 68, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 87-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Citations alone were enough to predict favorable conclusions in reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors

AU - Zhou, Xujuan

AU - Wang, Ying

AU - Tsafnat, Guy

AU - Coiera, Enrico

AU - Bourgeois, Florence T.

AU - Dunn, Adam G.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Study Design and Setting Reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors published during January 2005 to May 2013 were identified by searching PubMed. In a blinded evaluation, the reviews were classified as favorable if investigators agreed that they supported the use of neuraminidase inhibitors for prophylaxis or treatment of influenza. Reference lists were used to identify all unique citations to primary articles. Three classification methods were tested for their ability to predict favorable conclusions using only citation information.Objectives To examine the use of supervised machine learning to identify biases in evidence selection and determine if citation information can predict favorable conclusions in reviews about neuraminidase inhibitors.Results Citations to 4,574 articles were identified in 152 reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors, and 93 (61%) of these reviews were graded as favorable. Primary articles describing drug resistance were among the citations that were underrepresented in favorable reviews. The most accurate classifier predicted favorable conclusions with 96.2% accuracy, using citations to only 24 of 4,574 articles.Conclusion Favorable conclusions in reviews about neuraminidase inhibitors can be predicted using only information about the articles they cite. The approach highlights how evidence exclusion shapes conclusions in reviews and provides a method to evaluate citation practices in a corpus of reviews.

AB - Study Design and Setting Reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors published during January 2005 to May 2013 were identified by searching PubMed. In a blinded evaluation, the reviews were classified as favorable if investigators agreed that they supported the use of neuraminidase inhibitors for prophylaxis or treatment of influenza. Reference lists were used to identify all unique citations to primary articles. Three classification methods were tested for their ability to predict favorable conclusions using only citation information.Objectives To examine the use of supervised machine learning to identify biases in evidence selection and determine if citation information can predict favorable conclusions in reviews about neuraminidase inhibitors.Results Citations to 4,574 articles were identified in 152 reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors, and 93 (61%) of these reviews were graded as favorable. Primary articles describing drug resistance were among the citations that were underrepresented in favorable reviews. The most accurate classifier predicted favorable conclusions with 96.2% accuracy, using citations to only 24 of 4,574 articles.Conclusion Favorable conclusions in reviews about neuraminidase inhibitors can be predicted using only information about the articles they cite. The approach highlights how evidence exclusion shapes conclusions in reviews and provides a method to evaluate citation practices in a corpus of reviews.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84915749105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.014

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 87

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

T2 - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 1

ER -