Claiming Mutual Stance: On the Use of that's right by a Person With Aphasia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

One of the key contributions of conversation analytic research has been revealing the interactional work undertaken by recipients via minimal vocal responses. In recent years, conversation analysis has been increasingly applied to interactions involving people with aphasia (i.e., an acquired language disorder), but few studies have focused on the work they undertake as recipients of talk. This article discusses how a person with aphasia ("Valerie") used that's right in response to stance-taking from her conversation partners. It is argued that this response made a claim of mutual stance, i.e., that Valerie also held the stance that was put forward. That's right made salient simultaneous claims to epistemic access and rights, and alignment with the action(s)-in-progress, thereby promoting interpersonal affiliation. Particular advantages of this response for a person with aphasia are also highlighted. Finally, this article argues for the relevance of social action to aphasiology and the potential utility of recipiency for facilitating the social participation of people with aphasia.

LanguageEnglish
Pages359-384
Number of pages26
JournalResearch on Language and Social Interaction
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Aphasia
speech disorder
human being
conversation
recipient
Social Participation
Language Disorders
social participation
conversation analysis
interaction
language
Research

Cite this

@article{946d818642164a29a7c9a94724e3e67a,
title = "Claiming Mutual Stance: On the Use of that's right by a Person With Aphasia",
abstract = "One of the key contributions of conversation analytic research has been revealing the interactional work undertaken by recipients via minimal vocal responses. In recent years, conversation analysis has been increasingly applied to interactions involving people with aphasia (i.e., an acquired language disorder), but few studies have focused on the work they undertake as recipients of talk. This article discusses how a person with aphasia ({"}Valerie{"}) used that's right in response to stance-taking from her conversation partners. It is argued that this response made a claim of mutual stance, i.e., that Valerie also held the stance that was put forward. That's right made salient simultaneous claims to epistemic access and rights, and alignment with the action(s)-in-progress, thereby promoting interpersonal affiliation. Particular advantages of this response for a person with aphasia are also highlighted. Finally, this article argues for the relevance of social action to aphasiology and the potential utility of recipiency for facilitating the social participation of people with aphasia.",
author = "Barnes, {Scott E.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/08351813.2011.619312",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "359--384",
journal = "Research on Language and Social Interaction",
issn = "0835-1813",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "4",

}

Claiming Mutual Stance : On the Use of that's right by a Person With Aphasia. / Barnes, Scott E.

In: Research on Language and Social Interaction, Vol. 44, No. 4, 10.2011, p. 359-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Claiming Mutual Stance

T2 - Research on Language and Social Interaction

AU - Barnes, Scott E.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - One of the key contributions of conversation analytic research has been revealing the interactional work undertaken by recipients via minimal vocal responses. In recent years, conversation analysis has been increasingly applied to interactions involving people with aphasia (i.e., an acquired language disorder), but few studies have focused on the work they undertake as recipients of talk. This article discusses how a person with aphasia ("Valerie") used that's right in response to stance-taking from her conversation partners. It is argued that this response made a claim of mutual stance, i.e., that Valerie also held the stance that was put forward. That's right made salient simultaneous claims to epistemic access and rights, and alignment with the action(s)-in-progress, thereby promoting interpersonal affiliation. Particular advantages of this response for a person with aphasia are also highlighted. Finally, this article argues for the relevance of social action to aphasiology and the potential utility of recipiency for facilitating the social participation of people with aphasia.

AB - One of the key contributions of conversation analytic research has been revealing the interactional work undertaken by recipients via minimal vocal responses. In recent years, conversation analysis has been increasingly applied to interactions involving people with aphasia (i.e., an acquired language disorder), but few studies have focused on the work they undertake as recipients of talk. This article discusses how a person with aphasia ("Valerie") used that's right in response to stance-taking from her conversation partners. It is argued that this response made a claim of mutual stance, i.e., that Valerie also held the stance that was put forward. That's right made salient simultaneous claims to epistemic access and rights, and alignment with the action(s)-in-progress, thereby promoting interpersonal affiliation. Particular advantages of this response for a person with aphasia are also highlighted. Finally, this article argues for the relevance of social action to aphasiology and the potential utility of recipiency for facilitating the social participation of people with aphasia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857030234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08351813.2011.619312

DO - 10.1080/08351813.2011.619312

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 359

EP - 384

JO - Research on Language and Social Interaction

JF - Research on Language and Social Interaction

SN - 0835-1813

IS - 4

ER -