Clarifying the Role of Social Comparison in the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect (BFLPE): An Integrative Study

Pascal Huguet*, Florence Dumas, Herbert Marsh, Isabelle Régner, Ladd Wheeler, Jerry Suls, Marjorie Seaton, John Nezlek

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    129 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It has been speculated that the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE; the negative impact of highly selective academic settings on academic self-concept) is a consequence of invidious social comparisons experienced in higher ability schools. However, the direct role of such comparisons for the BFLPE has not heretofore been documented. The present study comprises the first evidence that the BFLPE (a) is eliminated after controlling for students' invidious comparisons with their class and (b) coexists with the assimilative and contrastive effects of upward social comparison choices on academic self-concept. These results increase understanding of the BFLPE and offer support for integrative approaches of social comparison (selective accessibility and interpretation comparison models) in a natural setting. They also lend support for the distinction between forced and deliberate social comparisons and the usefulness of distinguishing between absolute and relative comparison-level choice in self-assessment.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)156-170
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
    Volume97
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clarifying the Role of Social Comparison in the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect (BFLPE): An Integrative Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this