TY - JOUR
T1 - Classification and prediction of pilot weather encounters
T2 - A discriminant function analysis
AU - O'Hare, David
AU - Hunter, David R.
AU - Martinussen, Monica
AU - Wiggins, Mark
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - Introduction: Flight into adverse weather continues to be a significant hazard for General Aviation (GA) pilots. Weather-related crashes have a significantly higher fatality rate than other GA crashes. Previous research has identified lack of situational awareness, risk perception, and risk tolerance as possible explanations for why pilots would continue into adverse weather. However, very little is known about the nature of these encounters or the differences between pilots who avoid adverse weather and those who do not. Methods: Visitors to a web site described an experience with adverse weather and completed a range of measures of personal characteristics. Results: The resulting data from 364 pilots were carefully screened and subject to a discriminant function analysis. Two significant functions were found. The first, accounting for 69% of the variance, reflected measures of risk awareness and pilot judgment while the second differentiated pilots in terms of their experience levels. The variables measured in this study enabled us to correctly discriminate between the three groups of pilots considerably better (53% correct classifications) than would have been possible by chance (33% correct classifications). Conclusions: The implications of these findings for targeting safety interventions are discussed.
AB - Introduction: Flight into adverse weather continues to be a significant hazard for General Aviation (GA) pilots. Weather-related crashes have a significantly higher fatality rate than other GA crashes. Previous research has identified lack of situational awareness, risk perception, and risk tolerance as possible explanations for why pilots would continue into adverse weather. However, very little is known about the nature of these encounters or the differences between pilots who avoid adverse weather and those who do not. Methods: Visitors to a web site described an experience with adverse weather and completed a range of measures of personal characteristics. Results: The resulting data from 364 pilots were carefully screened and subject to a discriminant function analysis. Two significant functions were found. The first, accounting for 69% of the variance, reflected measures of risk awareness and pilot judgment while the second differentiated pilots in terms of their experience levels. The variables measured in this study enabled us to correctly discriminate between the three groups of pilots considerably better (53% correct classifications) than would have been possible by chance (33% correct classifications). Conclusions: The implications of these findings for targeting safety interventions are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955505638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3357/ASEM.2739.2011
DO - 10.3357/ASEM.2739.2011
M3 - Article
C2 - 21614869
AN - SCOPUS:79955505638
SN - 0095-6562
VL - 82
SP - 543
EP - 549
JO - Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine
JF - Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine
IS - 5
ER -