Clinical management of occupational low back pain in Australia

What is the real picture?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical management of patients with occupational low back pain (LBP) presenting to secondary care practitioners in Australia with national and international practice guidelines. Methods: A consecutive cohort of 401 patients with LBP following a work injury was assembled at the time of referral to secondary rehabilitation. A comprehensive assessment was performed to collect demographic, clinical and occupational data, which were analysed using descriptive statistics. Clinical and occupational management data were compared with evidence-based guidelines for the management of LBP. Results: This study revealed that in this cohort presenting to secondary care, referral for guideline-based active treatment was delayed until, on average, 10 months post-injury; radiographic investigations had been ordered for almost every patient, including those presenting in the first three months of their injury; the prevalence of co-morbidities was high and there were signs that psychological distress was under-diagnosed. Conclusions: This study reveals a lack of compliance with clinical guidelines for occupational back pain management in Australia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-380
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical management of occupational low back pain in Australia: What is the real picture?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this