Clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulation does not discriminate patients in an Australian physiotherapy primary care setting. Commentary

Mark J. Hancock; D. J. Lawrence

Clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulation does not discriminate patients in an Australian physiotherapy primary care setting. Commentary

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	284-285
Number of pages	2
Journal	Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies
Volume	13
Issue number	4
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2008
Externally published	Yes

Cite this

@article{dde0a40a9c6f4f4a8101c742b1ca2053,

title = "Clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulation does not discriminate patients in an Australian physiotherapy primary care setting. Commentary",

author = "Hancock, {Mark J.} and Lawrence, {D. J.}",

year = "2008",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "284--285",

journal = "Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies",

issn = "1465-3753",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulation does not discriminate patients in an Australian physiotherapy primary care setting. Commentary

AU - Hancock, Mark J.

AU - Lawrence, D. J.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56849127074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Short survey

AN - SCOPUS:56849127074

SN - 1465-3753

VL - 13

SP - 284

EP - 285

JO - Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

JF - Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

IS - 4

ER -

Clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulation does not discriminate patients in an Australian physiotherapy primary care setting. Commentary

Other files and links

Cite this