Abstract
The symmetrical CPW is a popular structure in the MMIC technology as all conductors are coplanar that does not require any via to approach the ground. The asymmetrical CPW (ACPW) shown in Fig.1 provides additional degree of freedom to control the line characteristic. Several analytical methods [1-2], closed- form expressions [3-4] and experimental investigations [5-6] have been reported to compute the conductor loss of the symmetrical CPW. For the case of microstrip line, Lee and Itoh [8] presented the phenomenological loss equivalence method. Heinrich [9] also presented a circuit model for this purpose applicable to the symmetrical CPW. Holloway and Kuester used the concept of 'stopping distance' to compute the conductor loss of microstrip, symmetrical CPW, symmetrical CPS etc. [4, 10, 11]. This method is accurate and applicable to both the thick and thin strip conductors. However, they have not used the method to compute the conductor loss of asymmetrical CPW (ACPW).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and CNC-USNC/URSI Radio Science Meeting - Leading the Wave, AP-S/URSI 2010 |
| Place of Publication | Piscataway, NJ |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
| Pages | 1-4 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781424449682 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and CNC-USNC/URSI Radio Science Meeting - Leading the Wave, AP-S/URSI 2010 - Toronto, ON, Canada Duration: 11 Jul 2010 → 17 Jul 2010 |
Other
| Other | 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and CNC-USNC/URSI Radio Science Meeting - Leading the Wave, AP-S/URSI 2010 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Canada |
| City | Toronto, ON |
| Period | 11/07/10 → 17/07/10 |