Abstract
While co-design has become ubiquitous in policy implementation, its potential for policy design remains to be investigated. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, this article systematically reviews the evidence to uncover a dearth of co-designed policies in high-income colonial-settler countries. Notwithstanding, the four co-designed policies illustrate seven critical themes that offer policymakers ideological considerations when facilitating the authentic involvement of ‘end-users’ in policy design. Though co-design is not a panacea, this review demonstrates how the embedment of co-design in policy design mechanisms can address entrenched power imbalances, empower community voices, wear down silos, and pull up more relevant seats to the decision-making table–phenomena uncommonly found in colonial-settler contexts. Further research is needed to understand the benefits, risks, and impacts of co-designed policies and practical implications for policymakers that operate within constrained landscapes to enable genuine participation of intended beneficiaries in policy design.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | CoDesign |
Early online date | 13 Sept 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 13 Sept 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
- Co-design
- colonial
- public policy