Coercive Control in Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence

Andrew Frankland*, Jac Brown

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    57 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Contemporary approaches to intimate partner violence (IPV) have been heavily shaped by the primacy given to coercive control over physical violence and the use of typologies. Few studies have attempted to apply these approaches to same-sex relationships. This study aimed to explore patterns of violence and control and examine the utility of typologies within same-sex domestic violence (SSDV). Data from 184 gay men and lesbians on their experiences with aggressive and controlling behaviors within same-sex relationships was used to identify categories consistent with Johnson's typology. Over half of the sample were non-violent and noncontrolling, while 13.0 % of respondents and 14.7 % of their partners had engaging in situational couple violence (SCV). Smaller proportions (4.4 % of respondents and 6.5 % of partners) engaged in coercive controlling violence (CCV). Rates of mutually violent control (MVC) were high (12.5 %). This typology was expanded to identify cases of non-violent control (NVC), which included 7.1 % of respondents and 5.4 % of partners. To date, no other studies have reported on the use of controlling behaviors within same-sex relationships. These data demonstrated the presence of patterns of control and violence consistent with categories originally identified in heterosexual couples. Data also supported the growing acceptance of the central role of coercive control in IPV.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)15-22
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Family Violence
    Volume29
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

    Keywords

    • Control
    • Domestic violence
    • Gay
    • Lesbian

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Coercive Control in Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this