Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians

Robyn Clay-Williams, Andrew Johnson, Paul Lane, Zhicheng Li, Lauren Camilleri, Teresa Winata, Michael Klug

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. Design/methodology/approach: This is a qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews with 18 senior clinicians, managers and executives who completed a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques were used to identify common themes. Research setting was a large tertiary care hospital and health service in regional Australia. Findings: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and attempted to implement at least some of the skills in the workplace. The main enabler was provision of a Negotiation Toolkit to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The main barrier was lack of time to reflect on the principles and prepare for upcoming negotiations. Participants reported that ongoing skill development and retention were not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training and mentoring. Research limitations/implications: Limitations include self-reported data, and interview questions positively elicited examples of training translation. Practical implications: The training was well matched to participant needs, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the workplace. Practical examples of how the skills were used in the workplace are provided. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first international study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an integrative bargaining negotiation training program targeting executives, senior clinicians and management staff in a large healthcare organization.

LanguageEnglish
Pages263-278
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of health organization and management
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Negotiating
Delivery of Health Care
Workplace
Interviews
Health care system
Tertiary Healthcare
Research
Tertiary Care Centers
Health Services
Work place
Organizations
Education

Keywords

  • Negotiation
  • Non-technical skills
  • Resilient health care
  • Training

Cite this

Clay-Williams, Robyn ; Johnson, Andrew ; Lane, Paul ; Li, Zhicheng ; Camilleri, Lauren ; Winata, Teresa ; Klug, Michael. / Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system : negotiation 101 for clinicians. In: Journal of health organization and management. 2018 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 263-278.
@article{154ac073d4f344469fc9c8177258c916,
title = "Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. Design/methodology/approach: This is a qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews with 18 senior clinicians, managers and executives who completed a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques were used to identify common themes. Research setting was a large tertiary care hospital and health service in regional Australia. Findings: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and attempted to implement at least some of the skills in the workplace. The main enabler was provision of a Negotiation Toolkit to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The main barrier was lack of time to reflect on the principles and prepare for upcoming negotiations. Participants reported that ongoing skill development and retention were not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training and mentoring. Research limitations/implications: Limitations include self-reported data, and interview questions positively elicited examples of training translation. Practical implications: The training was well matched to participant needs, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the workplace. Practical examples of how the skills were used in the workplace are provided. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first international study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an integrative bargaining negotiation training program targeting executives, senior clinicians and management staff in a large healthcare organization.",
keywords = "Negotiation, Non-technical skills, Resilient health care, Training",
author = "Robyn Clay-Williams and Andrew Johnson and Paul Lane and Zhicheng Li and Lauren Camilleri and Teresa Winata and Michael Klug",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "263--278",
journal = "Journal of Health, Organisation and Management",
issn = "1477-7266",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system : negotiation 101 for clinicians. / Clay-Williams, Robyn; Johnson, Andrew; Lane, Paul; Li, Zhicheng; Camilleri, Lauren; Winata, Teresa; Klug, Michael.

In: Journal of health organization and management, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 263-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system

T2 - Journal of Health, Organisation and Management

AU - Clay-Williams, Robyn

AU - Johnson, Andrew

AU - Lane, Paul

AU - Li, Zhicheng

AU - Camilleri, Lauren

AU - Winata, Teresa

AU - Klug, Michael

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. Design/methodology/approach: This is a qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews with 18 senior clinicians, managers and executives who completed a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques were used to identify common themes. Research setting was a large tertiary care hospital and health service in regional Australia. Findings: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and attempted to implement at least some of the skills in the workplace. The main enabler was provision of a Negotiation Toolkit to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The main barrier was lack of time to reflect on the principles and prepare for upcoming negotiations. Participants reported that ongoing skill development and retention were not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training and mentoring. Research limitations/implications: Limitations include self-reported data, and interview questions positively elicited examples of training translation. Practical implications: The training was well matched to participant needs, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the workplace. Practical examples of how the skills were used in the workplace are provided. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first international study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an integrative bargaining negotiation training program targeting executives, senior clinicians and management staff in a large healthcare organization.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. Design/methodology/approach: This is a qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews with 18 senior clinicians, managers and executives who completed a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques were used to identify common themes. Research setting was a large tertiary care hospital and health service in regional Australia. Findings: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and attempted to implement at least some of the skills in the workplace. The main enabler was provision of a Negotiation Toolkit to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The main barrier was lack of time to reflect on the principles and prepare for upcoming negotiations. Participants reported that ongoing skill development and retention were not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training and mentoring. Research limitations/implications: Limitations include self-reported data, and interview questions positively elicited examples of training translation. Practical implications: The training was well matched to participant needs, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the workplace. Practical examples of how the skills were used in the workplace are provided. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first international study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an integrative bargaining negotiation training program targeting executives, senior clinicians and management staff in a large healthcare organization.

KW - Negotiation

KW - Non-technical skills

KW - Resilient health care

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044282634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333

DO - 10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 263

EP - 278

JO - Journal of Health, Organisation and Management

JF - Journal of Health, Organisation and Management

SN - 1477-7266

IS - 2

ER -