Colonial settlement to colony

Bruce Kercher*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The legal structure of the first half century of colonial New South Wales had a military appearance. The first judges had the military title of Judge Advocate and the criminal court’s jury consisted of military officers. The colony’s initial constitution was autocratic, most of its powers being in the hands of the governors. Despite these restrictions, the colony’s courts applied civilian rather than military law. They were also the location for resistance to autocracy. English law arrived with the First Fleet in 1788, but it met new conditions. Most of the population were convicts who should have had limited legal rights, land holding had a different social function in the colony, and the invasion of indigenous interests could not be ignored entirely. After the military coup against Governor Bligh in 1808, the British government strengthened its controls, but only with a small reduction in autocratic government. The early amateur period was replaced by a professional judiciary, and in 1824 a new legislature began to limit the law-making powers of the governors. Despite these changes, English law continued to be altered to meet local circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge legal history of Australia
EditorsPeter Cane, Lisa Ford, Mark McMillan
Place of PublicationCambridge, UK ; New York
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
Chapter5
Pages87-107
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781108633949
ISBN (Print)9781108499224
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • amateur law making
  • colonisation
  • legal autocracy
  • legal pluralism
  • reception of English law
  • resistance to law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Colonial settlement to colony'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this