Combining carbon pricing with LPG subsidy for promoting preservation and restoration of Uttarakhand forests

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores the role of REDD+ programs in promoting community led preservation and restoration of forests in the Himalayan region of India. As there often exists a direct conflict between generating carbon credits through forest conservation and forestry-based livelihood sustenance activities, we consider the role of cooking gas subsidy in reducing communities' reliance on forests. Findings indicate that a price of 13 USD per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent can induce a switch away from fuelwood to lpg based cooking and promote carbon sequestration. However, for such an incentive to work, a community's combined earnings from non-timber forest products, farm income and livestock-based earnings also play an important role. Curtailing access to forests can reduce forestry-based incomes, which in turn, would require a higher carbon price incentive. If no subsidy is provided, carbon price would need to be increased to 27 USD per ton for a complete switch away from fuelwood consumption. Finally, afforestation in degraded lands can be successfully undertaken by the community when restoration costs are low at 2000 INR per ha. However, restoration costs exceeding 10,000 INR per ha or high forest fire risks are not conducive to community led restoration efforts even with the REDD+ incentives.
LanguageEnglish
Pages280-290
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume236
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Liquefied petroleum gas
Restoration
incentive
Carbon
fuelwood
Forestry
carbon
Cooking
Farms
Costs
forestry
Switches
income
nontimber forest product
afforestation
forest fire
cost
carbon sequestration
livestock
Conservation

Cite this

@article{c4efb560f24f46f48df9fd24cabab667,
title = "Combining carbon pricing with LPG subsidy for promoting preservation and restoration of Uttarakhand forests",
abstract = "This paper explores the role of REDD+ programs in promoting community led preservation and restoration of forests in the Himalayan region of India. As there often exists a direct conflict between generating carbon credits through forest conservation and forestry-based livelihood sustenance activities, we consider the role of cooking gas subsidy in reducing communities' reliance on forests. Findings indicate that a price of 13 USD per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent can induce a switch away from fuelwood to lpg based cooking and promote carbon sequestration. However, for such an incentive to work, a community's combined earnings from non-timber forest products, farm income and livestock-based earnings also play an important role. Curtailing access to forests can reduce forestry-based incomes, which in turn, would require a higher carbon price incentive. If no subsidy is provided, carbon price would need to be increased to 27 USD per ton for a complete switch away from fuelwood consumption. Finally, afforestation in degraded lands can be successfully undertaken by the community when restoration costs are low at 2000 INR per ha. However, restoration costs exceeding 10,000 INR per ha or high forest fire risks are not conducive to community led restoration efforts even with the REDD+ incentives.",
keywords = "REDD+, forest restoration, deforestation in Uttarakhand, LPG subsidy, fuelwood collection and deforestation",
author = "Ram Ranjan",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.110",
language = "English",
volume = "236",
pages = "280--290",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Combining carbon pricing with LPG subsidy for promoting preservation and restoration of Uttarakhand forests. / Ranjan, Ram.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 236, 15.04.2019, p. 280-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining carbon pricing with LPG subsidy for promoting preservation and restoration of Uttarakhand forests

AU - Ranjan,Ram

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - This paper explores the role of REDD+ programs in promoting community led preservation and restoration of forests in the Himalayan region of India. As there often exists a direct conflict between generating carbon credits through forest conservation and forestry-based livelihood sustenance activities, we consider the role of cooking gas subsidy in reducing communities' reliance on forests. Findings indicate that a price of 13 USD per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent can induce a switch away from fuelwood to lpg based cooking and promote carbon sequestration. However, for such an incentive to work, a community's combined earnings from non-timber forest products, farm income and livestock-based earnings also play an important role. Curtailing access to forests can reduce forestry-based incomes, which in turn, would require a higher carbon price incentive. If no subsidy is provided, carbon price would need to be increased to 27 USD per ton for a complete switch away from fuelwood consumption. Finally, afforestation in degraded lands can be successfully undertaken by the community when restoration costs are low at 2000 INR per ha. However, restoration costs exceeding 10,000 INR per ha or high forest fire risks are not conducive to community led restoration efforts even with the REDD+ incentives.

AB - This paper explores the role of REDD+ programs in promoting community led preservation and restoration of forests in the Himalayan region of India. As there often exists a direct conflict between generating carbon credits through forest conservation and forestry-based livelihood sustenance activities, we consider the role of cooking gas subsidy in reducing communities' reliance on forests. Findings indicate that a price of 13 USD per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent can induce a switch away from fuelwood to lpg based cooking and promote carbon sequestration. However, for such an incentive to work, a community's combined earnings from non-timber forest products, farm income and livestock-based earnings also play an important role. Curtailing access to forests can reduce forestry-based incomes, which in turn, would require a higher carbon price incentive. If no subsidy is provided, carbon price would need to be increased to 27 USD per ton for a complete switch away from fuelwood consumption. Finally, afforestation in degraded lands can be successfully undertaken by the community when restoration costs are low at 2000 INR per ha. However, restoration costs exceeding 10,000 INR per ha or high forest fire risks are not conducive to community led restoration efforts even with the REDD+ incentives.

KW - REDD+

KW - forest restoration

KW - deforestation in Uttarakhand

KW - LPG subsidy

KW - fuelwood collection and deforestation

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.110

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.110

M3 - Article

VL - 236

SP - 280

EP - 290

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

T2 - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -