Commentary: cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making

Gordon Pennycook; Robert M. Ross

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009

Commentary

cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making

Gordon Pennycook, Robert M. Ross

Department of Cognitive Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion

34 Citations (Scopus)

27 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Article number	9
Pages (from-to)	1-4
Number of pages	4
Journal	Frontiers in Psychology
Volume	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009
Publication status	Published - 22 Jan 2016

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2016. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

numeracy
Cognitive Reflection Test
biases
individual differences
dual-process theory

Cite this

Pennycook, G., & Ross, R. M. (2016). Commentary: cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-4. [9]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009

@article{1241d46e2886474aaef55c4146e18845,

title = "Commentary: cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making",

keywords = "numeracy, Cognitive Reflection Test, biases, individual differences, dual-process theory",

author = "Gordon Pennycook and Ross, {Robert M.}",

note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2016. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",

year = "2016",

month = "1",

day = "22",

doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

pages = "1--4",

journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",

issn = "1664-1078",

publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary

T2 - cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making

AU - Pennycook, Gordon

AU - Ross, Robert M.

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2016. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2016/1/22

Y1 - 2016/1/22

KW - numeracy

KW - Cognitive Reflection Test

KW - biases

KW - individual differences

KW - dual-process theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958552321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009

M3 - Comment/opinion

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 9

ER -

Access to Document

10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009

Mq-61925-Publisher version (open access)Final published version, 221 KBLicence: Unspecified

Link to publication in Scopus