Communication about risk - Dilemmas for general practitioners

Adrian Edwards*, Lindsay Prior, C. Butler, H. Houston, L. Jacobson, P. Kinnersley, R. Pill, F. M. Rapport, S. Rollnick, N. Stott, L. Tapper Jones, C. Wilkinson, M. Rohling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


Measures of risk frequently contribute to our understanding, prevention, or treatment of disease, but it is important that general practitioners (GPs) explain clinical risks effectively to patients to ensure they are not misunderstood, as risk information can assist in decision-making processes and encourage behavioural change. However, the interpretation of risks by patients and doctors varies. It is argued that problems arise because communication about risk is usually framed in terms of the language of chance or probability. In this paper, we describe how probability theory developed, and suggest that attempts to communicate empirical risk processes in probabilistic language are bound to produce dilemmas. We explore how the theory relates to clinical practice and identify key issues that doctors must address in discussing risk with individual patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)739-742
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Issue number424
Publication statusPublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes


  • Consultations
  • Probability theory
  • Risk factors

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Communication about risk - Dilemmas for general practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this