Comparative approach to pain perception in fishes: Commentary on Key on Fish Pain

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    104 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Arguments against the fact that fish feel pain repeatedly appear even in the face of growing evidence that they do. The standards used to judge pain perception keep moving as the hurdles are repeatedly cleared by novel research findings. There is undoubtedly a vested commercial interest in proving that fish do not feel pain, so the topic has a half-life well past its due date. Key (2016) reiterates previous perspectives on this topic characterised by a black-or-white view that is based on the proposed role of the human cortex in pain perception. I argue that this is incongruent with our understanding of evolutionary processes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number5
    Pages (from-to)1-7
    Number of pages7
    JournalAnimal Sentience
    Volume1
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Bibliographical note

    Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative approach to pain perception in fishes: Commentary on Key on Fish Pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this