Comparing clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome measures used in randomised controlled trials: a protocol

Miew Keen Choong, Guy Tsafnat, Peter Hibbert, William B. Runciman, Enrico Coiera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical quality indicators are necessary to monitor the performance of healthcare services. The development of indicators should, wherever possible, be based on research evidence to minimise the risk of bias which may be introduced during their development, because of logistic, ethical or financial constraints alone. The development of automated methods to identify the evidence base for candidate indicators should improve the process of indicator development. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome and process measurements extracted from randomised controlled clinical trial reports. Methods and analysis: National-level indicators for asthma management in children will be extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC) database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards. Outcome measures will be extracted from published English language randomised controlled trial (RCT) reports for asthma management in children aged below 12 years. The two sets of measures will be compared to assess any overlap. The study will provide insights into the relationship between clinical quality indicators and measurements in RCTs. This study will also yield a list of measurements used in RCTs for asthma management in children, and will find RCT evidence for indicators used in practice. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not necessary because this study will not include patient data. Findings will be disseminated through peerreviewed publications.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere008819
Pages1-5
Number of pages5
JournalBMJ Open
Volume5
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Clinical Protocols
Asthma
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Ethics
Publications
Language
Databases
Research

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Cite this

@article{8220c19e124d471dbc3666ea87ffee9d,
title = "Comparing clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome measures used in randomised controlled trials: a protocol",
abstract = "Introduction: Clinical quality indicators are necessary to monitor the performance of healthcare services. The development of indicators should, wherever possible, be based on research evidence to minimise the risk of bias which may be introduced during their development, because of logistic, ethical or financial constraints alone. The development of automated methods to identify the evidence base for candidate indicators should improve the process of indicator development. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome and process measurements extracted from randomised controlled clinical trial reports. Methods and analysis: National-level indicators for asthma management in children will be extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC) database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards. Outcome measures will be extracted from published English language randomised controlled trial (RCT) reports for asthma management in children aged below 12 years. The two sets of measures will be compared to assess any overlap. The study will provide insights into the relationship between clinical quality indicators and measurements in RCTs. This study will also yield a list of measurements used in RCTs for asthma management in children, and will find RCT evidence for indicators used in practice. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not necessary because this study will not include patient data. Findings will be disseminated through peerreviewed publications.",
author = "Choong, {Miew Keen} and Guy Tsafnat and Peter Hibbert and Runciman, {William B.} and Enrico Coiera",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008819",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "British Medical Journal Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

Comparing clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome measures used in randomised controlled trials : a protocol. / Choong, Miew Keen; Tsafnat, Guy; Hibbert, Peter; Runciman, William B.; Coiera, Enrico.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 5, No. 9, e008819, 2015, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome measures used in randomised controlled trials

T2 - BMJ Open

AU - Choong, Miew Keen

AU - Tsafnat, Guy

AU - Hibbert, Peter

AU - Runciman, William B.

AU - Coiera, Enrico

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Introduction: Clinical quality indicators are necessary to monitor the performance of healthcare services. The development of indicators should, wherever possible, be based on research evidence to minimise the risk of bias which may be introduced during their development, because of logistic, ethical or financial constraints alone. The development of automated methods to identify the evidence base for candidate indicators should improve the process of indicator development. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome and process measurements extracted from randomised controlled clinical trial reports. Methods and analysis: National-level indicators for asthma management in children will be extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC) database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards. Outcome measures will be extracted from published English language randomised controlled trial (RCT) reports for asthma management in children aged below 12 years. The two sets of measures will be compared to assess any overlap. The study will provide insights into the relationship between clinical quality indicators and measurements in RCTs. This study will also yield a list of measurements used in RCTs for asthma management in children, and will find RCT evidence for indicators used in practice. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not necessary because this study will not include patient data. Findings will be disseminated through peerreviewed publications.

AB - Introduction: Clinical quality indicators are necessary to monitor the performance of healthcare services. The development of indicators should, wherever possible, be based on research evidence to minimise the risk of bias which may be introduced during their development, because of logistic, ethical or financial constraints alone. The development of automated methods to identify the evidence base for candidate indicators should improve the process of indicator development. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome and process measurements extracted from randomised controlled clinical trial reports. Methods and analysis: National-level indicators for asthma management in children will be extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC) database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards. Outcome measures will be extracted from published English language randomised controlled trial (RCT) reports for asthma management in children aged below 12 years. The two sets of measures will be compared to assess any overlap. The study will provide insights into the relationship between clinical quality indicators and measurements in RCTs. This study will also yield a list of measurements used in RCTs for asthma management in children, and will find RCT evidence for indicators used in practice. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not necessary because this study will not include patient data. Findings will be disseminated through peerreviewed publications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948129812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1054146

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008819

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008819

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e008819

ER -