Comparing scores from full length, short form, and adaptive tests of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales

Matthew Sunderland, Mohammad H. Afzali, Philip J. Batterham, Alison L. Calear, Natacha Carragher, Megan Hobbs, Alison Mahoney, Lorna Peters, Tim Slade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The current study developed and examined the performance of a computerized adaptive version of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales (SIAS/SPS) and compared results with a previously developed static short form (SIAS-6/SPS-6) in terms of measurement precision, concordance with the full forms, and sensitivity to treatment. Among an online sample of Australian adults, there were relatively minor differences in the performance of the adaptive tests and static short forms when compared with the full scales. Moreover, both adaptive and static short forms generated similar effect sizes across treatment in a clinical sample. This provides further evidence for the use of static or adaptive short forms of the SIAS/SPS rather than the lengthier 20-item versions. However, at the individual level, the adaptive tests were able to maintain an acceptable level of precision, using few items as possible, across the severity continua in contrast to the static short forms.

LanguageEnglish
JournalAssessment
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Interpersonal Relations
Anxiety
Therapeutics
Social Phobia

Cite this

Sunderland, M., Afzali, M. H., Batterham, P. J., Calear, A. L., Carragher, N., Hobbs, M., ... Slade, T. (2019). Comparing scores from full length, short form, and adaptive tests of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119832657
Sunderland, Matthew ; Afzali, Mohammad H. ; Batterham, Philip J. ; Calear, Alison L. ; Carragher, Natacha ; Hobbs, Megan ; Mahoney, Alison ; Peters, Lorna ; Slade, Tim. / Comparing scores from full length, short form, and adaptive tests of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales. In: Assessment. 2019.
@article{94c2011d72db47d59e847c1dd8c18eab,
title = "Comparing scores from full length, short form, and adaptive tests of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales",
abstract = "The current study developed and examined the performance of a computerized adaptive version of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales (SIAS/SPS) and compared results with a previously developed static short form (SIAS-6/SPS-6) in terms of measurement precision, concordance with the full forms, and sensitivity to treatment. Among an online sample of Australian adults, there were relatively minor differences in the performance of the adaptive tests and static short forms when compared with the full scales. Moreover, both adaptive and static short forms generated similar effect sizes across treatment in a clinical sample. This provides further evidence for the use of static or adaptive short forms of the SIAS/SPS rather than the lengthier 20-item versions. However, at the individual level, the adaptive tests were able to maintain an acceptable level of precision, using few items as possible, across the severity continua in contrast to the static short forms.",
keywords = "social anxiety disorder, computerized adaptive testing, short forms, scale development, SIAS, SPS",
author = "Matthew Sunderland and Afzali, {Mohammad H.} and Batterham, {Philip J.} and Calear, {Alison L.} and Natacha Carragher and Megan Hobbs and Alison Mahoney and Lorna Peters and Tim Slade",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1177/1073191119832657",
language = "English",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

Comparing scores from full length, short form, and adaptive tests of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales. / Sunderland, Matthew; Afzali, Mohammad H.; Batterham, Philip J.; Calear, Alison L.; Carragher, Natacha; Hobbs, Megan; Mahoney, Alison; Peters, Lorna; Slade, Tim.

In: Assessment, 15.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing scores from full length, short form, and adaptive tests of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales

AU - Sunderland,Matthew

AU - Afzali,Mohammad H.

AU - Batterham,Philip J.

AU - Calear,Alison L.

AU - Carragher,Natacha

AU - Hobbs,Megan

AU - Mahoney,Alison

AU - Peters,Lorna

AU - Slade,Tim

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - The current study developed and examined the performance of a computerized adaptive version of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales (SIAS/SPS) and compared results with a previously developed static short form (SIAS-6/SPS-6) in terms of measurement precision, concordance with the full forms, and sensitivity to treatment. Among an online sample of Australian adults, there were relatively minor differences in the performance of the adaptive tests and static short forms when compared with the full scales. Moreover, both adaptive and static short forms generated similar effect sizes across treatment in a clinical sample. This provides further evidence for the use of static or adaptive short forms of the SIAS/SPS rather than the lengthier 20-item versions. However, at the individual level, the adaptive tests were able to maintain an acceptable level of precision, using few items as possible, across the severity continua in contrast to the static short forms.

AB - The current study developed and examined the performance of a computerized adaptive version of the Social Interaction Anxiety and Social Phobia Scales (SIAS/SPS) and compared results with a previously developed static short form (SIAS-6/SPS-6) in terms of measurement precision, concordance with the full forms, and sensitivity to treatment. Among an online sample of Australian adults, there were relatively minor differences in the performance of the adaptive tests and static short forms when compared with the full scales. Moreover, both adaptive and static short forms generated similar effect sizes across treatment in a clinical sample. This provides further evidence for the use of static or adaptive short forms of the SIAS/SPS rather than the lengthier 20-item versions. However, at the individual level, the adaptive tests were able to maintain an acceptable level of precision, using few items as possible, across the severity continua in contrast to the static short forms.

KW - social anxiety disorder

KW - computerized adaptive testing

KW - short forms

KW - scale development

KW - SIAS

KW - SPS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063032059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191119832657

DO - 10.1177/1073191119832657

M3 - Article

JO - Assessment

T2 - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

ER -