Comparing two types of diagnostic items to evaluate understanding of heat and temperature concepts

Hye-Eun Chu; A. L. Chandrasegaran; David F. Treagust

Comparing two types of diagnostic items to evaluate understanding of heat and temperature concepts

Hye-Eun Chu, A. L. Chandrasegaran, David F. Treagust

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate an efficient method to assess year 8 (age 13-14) students' conceptual understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Two different types of instruments were used in this study: Type 1, consisting of multiple-choice items with open-ended justifications; and Type 2, consisting of two-tier multiple-choice items. Each of the instruments was administered to two separate cohorts of 173 and 143 year 8 students of similar achievement. The findings indicated that the students were better able to show their understanding in the two-tier multiple-choice items. Hence, based on this investigation, two-tier multiple-choice items may be more suitable for evaluating year 8 students' understanding of science concepts.

Original language	English
Article number	EJ1174745
Pages (from-to)	107-116
Number of pages	10
Journal	School Science Review
Volume	99
Issue number	368
Publication status	Published - Mar 2018

Keywords

diagnostic assessment tools
heat and temperature concept
Conceptual understanding

Access to Document

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/328381815.pdfLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{811277c7032d4cf4a82492c6d4775789,

title = "Comparing two types of diagnostic items to evaluate understanding of heat and temperature concepts",

abstract = "The purpose of this research was to investigate an efficient method to assess year 8 (age 13-14) students' conceptual understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Two different types of instruments were used in this study: Type 1, consisting of multiple-choice items with open-ended justifications; and Type 2, consisting of two-tier multiple-choice items. Each of the instruments was administered to two separate cohorts of 173 and 143 year 8 students of similar achievement. The findings indicated that the students were better able to show their understanding in the two-tier multiple-choice items. Hence, based on this investigation, two-tier multiple-choice items may be more suitable for evaluating year 8 students' understanding of science concepts.",

keywords = "diagnostic assessment tools, heat and temperature concept, Conceptual understanding",

author = "Hye-Eun Chu and Chandrasegaran, \{A. L.\} and Treagust, \{David F.\}",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

language = "English",

volume = "99",

pages = "107--116",

journal = "School Science Review",

issn = "0036-6811",

publisher = "The Association for Science Education",

number = "368",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing two types of diagnostic items to evaluate understanding of heat and temperature concepts

AU - Chu, Hye-Eun

AU - Chandrasegaran, A. L.

AU - Treagust, David F.

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - The purpose of this research was to investigate an efficient method to assess year 8 (age 13-14) students' conceptual understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Two different types of instruments were used in this study: Type 1, consisting of multiple-choice items with open-ended justifications; and Type 2, consisting of two-tier multiple-choice items. Each of the instruments was administered to two separate cohorts of 173 and 143 year 8 students of similar achievement. The findings indicated that the students were better able to show their understanding in the two-tier multiple-choice items. Hence, based on this investigation, two-tier multiple-choice items may be more suitable for evaluating year 8 students' understanding of science concepts.

AB - The purpose of this research was to investigate an efficient method to assess year 8 (age 13-14) students' conceptual understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Two different types of instruments were used in this study: Type 1, consisting of multiple-choice items with open-ended justifications; and Type 2, consisting of two-tier multiple-choice items. Each of the instruments was administered to two separate cohorts of 173 and 143 year 8 students of similar achievement. The findings indicated that the students were better able to show their understanding in the two-tier multiple-choice items. Hence, based on this investigation, two-tier multiple-choice items may be more suitable for evaluating year 8 students' understanding of science concepts.

KW - diagnostic assessment tools

KW - heat and temperature concept

KW - Conceptual understanding

UR - https://www.ase.org.uk/journals/school-science-review/2018/03/368/

M3 - Article

SN - 0036-6811

VL - 99

SP - 107

EP - 116

JO - School Science Review

JF - School Science Review

IS - 368

M1 - EJ1174745

ER -

Comparing two types of diagnostic items to evaluate understanding of heat and temperature concepts

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

The impact of short-cycle formative assessments on students' conceptual understanding and beliefs of learning among academically lower achieving secondary school students in science

Cite this

Comparing two types of diagnostic items to evaluate understanding of heat and temperature concepts

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

The impact of short-cycle formative assessments on students' conceptual understanding and beliefs of learning among academically lower achieving secondary school students in science

Cite this