Comparison of fetal porcine aggregates of purified β-cells versus islet-like cell clusters as a treatment of diabetes

Jian Tu, Pauline Khoury, Lindy Williams, Bernard E. Tuch*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)


    Fetal pig islet-like cell clusters (ICCs) have the potential to reverse diabetes 1-5 months after transplantation. In a fetal ICC, however, β-cells constitute only 6-8% of the cells, in contrast to 65% in an adult pig islet. Attempts to purify fetal β-cells from cell clusters and compare their function to that of ICCs have not been shown previously. β-Cells were purified from ICCs isolated from the fetal pig pancreas. These were then aggregated and maintained in culture for 3 days. ICCs were isolated from fetal pig pancreas and allowed to round up in culture for 3 days. Transplantation of aggregates and ICCs (10,000 and 12,600, respectively) into diabetic immunoincompetent mice resulted in normoglycemia at 18 ± 2 and 8 ±1 weeks, respectively (p = 0.0006). Removal of grafts after normalization of blood glucose levels resulted in rapid return of hyperglycemia in both groups. In conclusion, a purified population of immature β-cells can be produced from the fetal pig pancreas. The reason these cells take longer than ICCs to reverse diabetes when transplanted is postulated to be because of the relative lack of precursor cells from which β-cells differentiate. This finding may have implications for stem cell therapy, as other cell types, other than purified β-cells, may be necessary for appropriate function in vivo.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)525-534
    Number of pages10
    JournalCell Transplantation
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 2004


    • Diabetes
    • Fetal β-cells
    • Porcine
    • Purification
    • Transplantation


    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of fetal porcine aggregates of purified β-cells versus islet-like cell clusters as a treatment of diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this