TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of mandibular advancement splint and tongue stabilizing device in obstructive sleep apnea
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Deane, Sheryn A.
AU - Cistulli, Peter A.
AU - Ng, Andrew T.
AU - Zeng, Biao
AU - Petocz, Peter
AU - Darendeliler, M. Ali
PY - 2009/5/1
Y1 - 2009/5/1
N2 - Study Objectives: To compare the efficacy of a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) and a novel tongue stabilizing device (TSD) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Design: A randomized crossover design was used. Patients: Twenty-seven patients (20 male, 7 female), recruited from a tertiary hospital sleep clinic. Measurements and Results: The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reduced with MAS (11.68 ± 8.94, P = 0.000) and TSD (13.15 ± 10.77, P = 0.002) compared with baseline (26.96 ± 17.17). The arousal index decreased for MAS (21.09 ± 9.27, P = 0.004) and TSD (21.9 ± 10.56, P = 0.001) compared with baseline (33.23 ± 16.41). Sixty-eight percent of patients achieved a complete or partial response with MAS, compared with 45% with TSD. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was decreased with MAS (P = <0.001) and TSD (P = 0.002). Subjective improvements in snoring and quality of sleep were reported, with a better response for MAS than TSD. Compliance was poorer for TSD, and the side effect profiles of the 2 modalities were different. All patients were satisfied with MAS compared to TSD, and 91% of patients preferred the MAS. Conclusion: Objective testing showed the MAS and TSD had similar efficacy in terms of AHI reduction. Patients reported improvements with both devices; however, better compliance and a clear preference for MAS was apparent when both devices were offered. Longer term studies are needed to clarify the role of TSD.
AB - Study Objectives: To compare the efficacy of a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) and a novel tongue stabilizing device (TSD) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Design: A randomized crossover design was used. Patients: Twenty-seven patients (20 male, 7 female), recruited from a tertiary hospital sleep clinic. Measurements and Results: The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reduced with MAS (11.68 ± 8.94, P = 0.000) and TSD (13.15 ± 10.77, P = 0.002) compared with baseline (26.96 ± 17.17). The arousal index decreased for MAS (21.09 ± 9.27, P = 0.004) and TSD (21.9 ± 10.56, P = 0.001) compared with baseline (33.23 ± 16.41). Sixty-eight percent of patients achieved a complete or partial response with MAS, compared with 45% with TSD. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was decreased with MAS (P = <0.001) and TSD (P = 0.002). Subjective improvements in snoring and quality of sleep were reported, with a better response for MAS than TSD. Compliance was poorer for TSD, and the side effect profiles of the 2 modalities were different. All patients were satisfied with MAS compared to TSD, and 91% of patients preferred the MAS. Conclusion: Objective testing showed the MAS and TSD had similar efficacy in terms of AHI reduction. Patients reported improvements with both devices; however, better compliance and a clear preference for MAS was apparent when both devices were offered. Longer term studies are needed to clarify the role of TSD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66249109620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 19480232
AN - SCOPUS:66249109620
SN - 0161-8105
VL - 32
SP - 648
EP - 653
JO - Sleep
JF - Sleep
IS - 5
ER -