TY - JOUR
T1 - Complexity and practical knowledge in the social sciences
T2 - A comment on Stehr and Grundmann
AU - Meagher, Gabrielle
AU - Wilson, Shaun
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - This paper takes issue with Stehr and Grundmann's argument in this journal that sociology's poor record of contribution to practical knowledge results from sociologists' misguided attachment to the idea that social phenomena are peculiarly complex, and so peculiarly resistant to efforts at practical knowledge formation. Stehr and Grundmann develop their thesis by contrasting sociology to economics, claiming the latter's superior methods and disciplinary cultures enable it to contribute more successfully to solving practical problems. We argue that Stehr and Grundmann's comparison of the relative success of economics and sociology as policy sciences underestimates the extent to which the complexity argument has been destructive of economics' capacity to contribute practical knowledge, and overestimates the importance of disciplinary methods and cultures in explaining the use of economics in policy making. Further, we argue that the 'complexity argument' can contribute to better policy making, by virtue of its capacity to high-light the dangers of simplistic or fundamentalist solutions to social problems with complex causes.
AB - This paper takes issue with Stehr and Grundmann's argument in this journal that sociology's poor record of contribution to practical knowledge results from sociologists' misguided attachment to the idea that social phenomena are peculiarly complex, and so peculiarly resistant to efforts at practical knowledge formation. Stehr and Grundmann develop their thesis by contrasting sociology to economics, claiming the latter's superior methods and disciplinary cultures enable it to contribute more successfully to solving practical problems. We argue that Stehr and Grundmann's comparison of the relative success of economics and sociology as policy sciences underestimates the extent to which the complexity argument has been destructive of economics' capacity to contribute practical knowledge, and overestimates the importance of disciplinary methods and cultures in explaining the use of economics in policy making. Further, we argue that the 'complexity argument' can contribute to better policy making, by virtue of its capacity to high-light the dangers of simplistic or fundamentalist solutions to social problems with complex causes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036984670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0007131022000021533
DO - 10.1080/0007131022000021533
M3 - Article
C2 - 12556288
AN - SCOPUS:0036984670
SN - 0007-1315
VL - 53
SP - 659
EP - 666
JO - British Journal of Sociology
JF - British Journal of Sociology
IS - 4
ER -