Complexity and practical knowledge in the social sciences: A comment on Stehr and Grundmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper takes issue with Stehr and Grundmann's argument in this journal that sociology's poor record of contribution to practical knowledge results from sociologists' misguided attachment to the idea that social phenomena are peculiarly complex, and so peculiarly resistant to efforts at practical knowledge formation. Stehr and Grundmann develop their thesis by contrasting sociology to economics, claiming the latter's superior methods and disciplinary cultures enable it to contribute more successfully to solving practical problems. We argue that Stehr and Grundmann's comparison of the relative success of economics and sociology as policy sciences underestimates the extent to which the complexity argument has been destructive of economics' capacity to contribute practical knowledge, and overestimates the importance of disciplinary methods and cultures in explaining the use of economics in policy making. Further, we argue that the 'complexity argument' can contribute to better policy making, by virtue of its capacity to high-light the dangers of simplistic or fundamentalist solutions to social problems with complex causes.

LanguageEnglish
Pages659-666
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Sociology
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social science
sociology
economics
science policy
Social Problems
sociologist
cause

Cite this

@article{225ec9f990da45de87dfccbcfa942b5f,
title = "Complexity and practical knowledge in the social sciences: A comment on Stehr and Grundmann",
abstract = "This paper takes issue with Stehr and Grundmann's argument in this journal that sociology's poor record of contribution to practical knowledge results from sociologists' misguided attachment to the idea that social phenomena are peculiarly complex, and so peculiarly resistant to efforts at practical knowledge formation. Stehr and Grundmann develop their thesis by contrasting sociology to economics, claiming the latter's superior methods and disciplinary cultures enable it to contribute more successfully to solving practical problems. We argue that Stehr and Grundmann's comparison of the relative success of economics and sociology as policy sciences underestimates the extent to which the complexity argument has been destructive of economics' capacity to contribute practical knowledge, and overestimates the importance of disciplinary methods and cultures in explaining the use of economics in policy making. Further, we argue that the 'complexity argument' can contribute to better policy making, by virtue of its capacity to high-light the dangers of simplistic or fundamentalist solutions to social problems with complex causes.",
author = "Gabrielle Meagher and Shaun Wilson",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1080/0007131022000021533",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "659--666",
journal = "British Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0007-1315",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "4",

}

Complexity and practical knowledge in the social sciences : A comment on Stehr and Grundmann. / Meagher, Gabrielle; Wilson, Shaun.

In: British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2002, p. 659-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complexity and practical knowledge in the social sciences

T2 - British Journal of Sociology

AU - Meagher, Gabrielle

AU - Wilson, Shaun

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This paper takes issue with Stehr and Grundmann's argument in this journal that sociology's poor record of contribution to practical knowledge results from sociologists' misguided attachment to the idea that social phenomena are peculiarly complex, and so peculiarly resistant to efforts at practical knowledge formation. Stehr and Grundmann develop their thesis by contrasting sociology to economics, claiming the latter's superior methods and disciplinary cultures enable it to contribute more successfully to solving practical problems. We argue that Stehr and Grundmann's comparison of the relative success of economics and sociology as policy sciences underestimates the extent to which the complexity argument has been destructive of economics' capacity to contribute practical knowledge, and overestimates the importance of disciplinary methods and cultures in explaining the use of economics in policy making. Further, we argue that the 'complexity argument' can contribute to better policy making, by virtue of its capacity to high-light the dangers of simplistic or fundamentalist solutions to social problems with complex causes.

AB - This paper takes issue with Stehr and Grundmann's argument in this journal that sociology's poor record of contribution to practical knowledge results from sociologists' misguided attachment to the idea that social phenomena are peculiarly complex, and so peculiarly resistant to efforts at practical knowledge formation. Stehr and Grundmann develop their thesis by contrasting sociology to economics, claiming the latter's superior methods and disciplinary cultures enable it to contribute more successfully to solving practical problems. We argue that Stehr and Grundmann's comparison of the relative success of economics and sociology as policy sciences underestimates the extent to which the complexity argument has been destructive of economics' capacity to contribute practical knowledge, and overestimates the importance of disciplinary methods and cultures in explaining the use of economics in policy making. Further, we argue that the 'complexity argument' can contribute to better policy making, by virtue of its capacity to high-light the dangers of simplistic or fundamentalist solutions to social problems with complex causes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036984670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0007131022000021533

DO - 10.1080/0007131022000021533

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 659

EP - 666

JO - British Journal of Sociology

JF - British Journal of Sociology

SN - 0007-1315

IS - 4

ER -