TY - JOUR
T1 - Composite graft replacement of the aortic root after previous cardiac surgery
T2 - a 20-year experience
AU - Vallely, Michael P.
AU - Hughes, Clifford F.
AU - Bannon, Paul G.
AU - Hendel, P. Nicholas
AU - French, Bruce G.
AU - Bayfield, Matthew S.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Background. An aging population and prolonged survival of patients after cardiac operations has meant that composite aortic root replacement after previous cardiac operation is being performed with increasing frequency. Methods. From January 1979 to July 1999, 32 patients underwent 'reoperative' composite replacement of the aortic root at our institution. Previous operations were 16 aortic valve replacement, 9 coronary artery bypass grafting, 5 repair aortic dissection, and 7 others. Indications for operation included ascending aortic aneurysm in 16 patients, ascending aortic dissections in 10 patients, and other in 6 patients. Results. The unit elective mortality was 3 of 26 (11.5%). One surgeon's elective mortality was 1 of 22 (4.6%). The unit emergent mortality was 6 of 6 (100%). There has been one late death. Morbidity was low. Conclusions. Reoperative aortic root replacement is a technically demanding procedure, but expertise in the area achieves low elective mortality. Consideration should be given to aortic root replacement at the initial procedure. Close follow-up of postcardiac operation patients is necessary to proceed with elective aortic root replacement if indicated. Emergent presentation in the reoperative setting has a very poor prognosis. (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
AB - Background. An aging population and prolonged survival of patients after cardiac operations has meant that composite aortic root replacement after previous cardiac operation is being performed with increasing frequency. Methods. From January 1979 to July 1999, 32 patients underwent 'reoperative' composite replacement of the aortic root at our institution. Previous operations were 16 aortic valve replacement, 9 coronary artery bypass grafting, 5 repair aortic dissection, and 7 others. Indications for operation included ascending aortic aneurysm in 16 patients, ascending aortic dissections in 10 patients, and other in 6 patients. Results. The unit elective mortality was 3 of 26 (11.5%). One surgeon's elective mortality was 1 of 22 (4.6%). The unit emergent mortality was 6 of 6 (100%). There has been one late death. Morbidity was low. Conclusions. Reoperative aortic root replacement is a technically demanding procedure, but expertise in the area achieves low elective mortality. Consideration should be given to aortic root replacement at the initial procedure. Close follow-up of postcardiac operation patients is necessary to proceed with elective aortic root replacement if indicated. Emergent presentation in the reoperative setting has a very poor prognosis. (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033797793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01509-5
DO - 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01509-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 11016322
AN - SCOPUS:0033797793
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 70
SP - 851
EP - 855
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 3
ER -