Abstract
We are invited to picture conceptual improvement as a kind of engineering. Extract the concept, repair what is defective, and return it to use. But the picture requires a background assumption that is rarely examined: that concepts can step outside the practices that give them life. I deny that assumption. Concepts are social phenomena sustained through ongoing labour: created, reproduced, contested, and policed within what I call conceptual economies. Once recognised, the engineering image loses its grip. There is no standpoint external to the economy from which design can occur, and the much-discussed implementation challenge is a misdescription of how conceptual change unfolds. Conceptual improvement is better understood as a mode of participation within a labour system. This offers a more realistic account of what philosophers are doing when revising our concepts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 17 Feb 2026 |
Keywords
- conceptual engineering
- ameliorative analysis
- concepts
- implementation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptual economics Contra conceptual engineering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver