TY - JOUR
T1 - Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics
AU - Rogers, W. A.
AU - Draper, H.
N1 - Copyright retained by the author(s). Article originally published in Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 29, Issue 4, pp.220-224. The original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.4.220. Article archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author and according to publisher conditions. For further information see http://www.bmj.com/.
PY - 2003/8
Y1 - 2003/8
N2 - In this paper we consider the use of cases in medical ethics research and teaching. To date, there has been little discussion about the consent or confidentiality requirements that ought to govern the use of cases in these areas. This is in marked contrast to the requirements for consent to publish cases in clinical journals, or to use personal information in research. There are a number of reasons why it might be difficult to obtain consent to use cases in ethics. Many cases concern people who are incompetent, and thus unable to give consent. Often the material is of a sensitive nature, it is not clear who should give consent, or the ethicist has no access to those involved. We argue that the use of cases in ethics research and teaching can be justified by appeal to the public interest argument, and suggest a number of areas for discussion and clarification.
AB - In this paper we consider the use of cases in medical ethics research and teaching. To date, there has been little discussion about the consent or confidentiality requirements that ought to govern the use of cases in these areas. This is in marked contrast to the requirements for consent to publish cases in clinical journals, or to use personal information in research. There are a number of reasons why it might be difficult to obtain consent to use cases in ethics. Many cases concern people who are incompetent, and thus unable to give consent. Often the material is of a sensitive nature, it is not clear who should give consent, or the ethicist has no access to those involved. We argue that the use of cases in ethics research and teaching can be justified by appeal to the public interest argument, and suggest a number of areas for discussion and clarification.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042416568&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jme.29.4.220
DO - 10.1136/jme.29.4.220
M3 - Article
C2 - 12930854
AN - SCOPUS:0042416568
SN - 0306-6800
VL - 29
SP - 220
EP - 224
JO - Journal of Medical Ethics
JF - Journal of Medical Ethics
IS - 4
ER -