Confirmation bias in accounting judgments: the case for International Financial Reporting Standards for small and medium-sized enterprises

Dinuja Perera, Parmod Chand, Rajni Mala*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conduct an experiment that investigates confirmation bias in the reporting judgments of accountants when applying International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The results indicate that accountants’ judgments are biased towards the recognition and measurement principles of full IFRS when applying IFRS for SMEs. The results also suggest that confirmation bias in judgments can be mitigated by increasing accountants’ awareness of justification requirements and by using appropriate decision aids. These results are likely to be of interest to the 70-plus countries that have adopted the SME standard and countries that continue to contemplate its adoption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4093-4119
Number of pages27
JournalAccounting and Finance
Volume60
Issue number4
Early online date9 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Confirmation bias
  • International Financial Reporting Standards
  • Judgment justification
  • Reporting judgment
  • Small and medium-sized enterprises

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Confirmation bias in accounting judgments: the case for International Financial Reporting Standards for small and medium-sized enterprises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this