Connectivity Effects in Pseudoclefts in Child Language

Hirohisa Kiguchi, Rosalind Thornton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A prominent feature of specificational pseudoclefts is connectivity effects. Despite the absence of c-command in the surface syntax, specificational pseudoclefts yield interpretations that are governed by c-command in other constructions. The present study focused on two kinds of specificational pseudoclefts (SPCs). In one, a wh-clause with a pronoun precedes the copula and then a phrase containing an R-expression expression (e.g. What he said was the blue boy's wheelchair was the fastest). Principle C effects (noncoreference) are enforced despite the absence of surface c-command. In the second type of SPC, a disjunctive phrase precedes the copula and a wh-clause that contains a negative quantifier (e.g. A shell or a jewel is what nobody brought back). Here, despite lack of surface c-command between negation and the disjunction, disjunction yields a conjunctive interpretation. Both kinds of SPCs pose a poverty-of-the-stimulus problem; how do children come to assign adult-like interpretations to SPCs, when the surface syntax does not provide relevant clues to semantic interpretation? A truth value judgment task revealed that 17 4-5 year-old English-speaking child participants (mean age 4;8) consistently interpreted both kinds of SPCs in the same way as adults, enforcing both Principle C and the conjunctive interpretation of disjunction.

LanguageEnglish
Pages34-65
Number of pages32
JournalStudia Linguistica
Volume70
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

interpretation
language
syntax
value judgement
speaking
stimulus
semantics
Connectivity
Child Language
Pseudocleft
poverty
lack
C-command
Principle C
Clause
Syntax
Copula

Cite this

Kiguchi, Hirohisa ; Thornton, Rosalind. / Connectivity Effects in Pseudoclefts in Child Language. In: Studia Linguistica. 2016 ; Vol. 70, No. 1. pp. 34-65.
@article{be6407b9e137479eb8484c39bffe8855,
title = "Connectivity Effects in Pseudoclefts in Child Language",
abstract = "A prominent feature of specificational pseudoclefts is connectivity effects. Despite the absence of c-command in the surface syntax, specificational pseudoclefts yield interpretations that are governed by c-command in other constructions. The present study focused on two kinds of specificational pseudoclefts (SPCs). In one, a wh-clause with a pronoun precedes the copula and then a phrase containing an R-expression expression (e.g. What he said was the blue boy's wheelchair was the fastest). Principle C effects (noncoreference) are enforced despite the absence of surface c-command. In the second type of SPC, a disjunctive phrase precedes the copula and a wh-clause that contains a negative quantifier (e.g. A shell or a jewel is what nobody brought back). Here, despite lack of surface c-command between negation and the disjunction, disjunction yields a conjunctive interpretation. Both kinds of SPCs pose a poverty-of-the-stimulus problem; how do children come to assign adult-like interpretations to SPCs, when the surface syntax does not provide relevant clues to semantic interpretation? A truth value judgment task revealed that 17 4-5 year-old English-speaking child participants (mean age 4;8) consistently interpreted both kinds of SPCs in the same way as adults, enforcing both Principle C and the conjunctive interpretation of disjunction.",
author = "Hirohisa Kiguchi and Rosalind Thornton",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/stul.12043",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "34--65",
journal = "Studia Linguistica",
issn = "0039-3193",
publisher = "BLACKWELL PUBL LTD",
number = "1",

}

Connectivity Effects in Pseudoclefts in Child Language. / Kiguchi, Hirohisa; Thornton, Rosalind.

In: Studia Linguistica, Vol. 70, No. 1, 01.04.2016, p. 34-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Connectivity Effects in Pseudoclefts in Child Language

AU - Kiguchi, Hirohisa

AU - Thornton, Rosalind

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - A prominent feature of specificational pseudoclefts is connectivity effects. Despite the absence of c-command in the surface syntax, specificational pseudoclefts yield interpretations that are governed by c-command in other constructions. The present study focused on two kinds of specificational pseudoclefts (SPCs). In one, a wh-clause with a pronoun precedes the copula and then a phrase containing an R-expression expression (e.g. What he said was the blue boy's wheelchair was the fastest). Principle C effects (noncoreference) are enforced despite the absence of surface c-command. In the second type of SPC, a disjunctive phrase precedes the copula and a wh-clause that contains a negative quantifier (e.g. A shell or a jewel is what nobody brought back). Here, despite lack of surface c-command between negation and the disjunction, disjunction yields a conjunctive interpretation. Both kinds of SPCs pose a poverty-of-the-stimulus problem; how do children come to assign adult-like interpretations to SPCs, when the surface syntax does not provide relevant clues to semantic interpretation? A truth value judgment task revealed that 17 4-5 year-old English-speaking child participants (mean age 4;8) consistently interpreted both kinds of SPCs in the same way as adults, enforcing both Principle C and the conjunctive interpretation of disjunction.

AB - A prominent feature of specificational pseudoclefts is connectivity effects. Despite the absence of c-command in the surface syntax, specificational pseudoclefts yield interpretations that are governed by c-command in other constructions. The present study focused on two kinds of specificational pseudoclefts (SPCs). In one, a wh-clause with a pronoun precedes the copula and then a phrase containing an R-expression expression (e.g. What he said was the blue boy's wheelchair was the fastest). Principle C effects (noncoreference) are enforced despite the absence of surface c-command. In the second type of SPC, a disjunctive phrase precedes the copula and a wh-clause that contains a negative quantifier (e.g. A shell or a jewel is what nobody brought back). Here, despite lack of surface c-command between negation and the disjunction, disjunction yields a conjunctive interpretation. Both kinds of SPCs pose a poverty-of-the-stimulus problem; how do children come to assign adult-like interpretations to SPCs, when the surface syntax does not provide relevant clues to semantic interpretation? A truth value judgment task revealed that 17 4-5 year-old English-speaking child participants (mean age 4;8) consistently interpreted both kinds of SPCs in the same way as adults, enforcing both Principle C and the conjunctive interpretation of disjunction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959493081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/stul.12043

DO - 10.1111/stul.12043

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 34

EP - 65

JO - Studia Linguistica

T2 - Studia Linguistica

JF - Studia Linguistica

SN - 0039-3193

IS - 1

ER -