Conscientious objection and institutional objection to voluntary assistance in dying: an ethico-legal critique

Ian Kerridge; Cameron Stewart; Jackie Leach Scully; Mary Chiarella; Julie Hamblin; Adam Johnston; Christopher Ryan; Linda Sheahan; George Skowronski

Conscientious objection and institutional objection to voluntary assistance in dying: an ethico-legal critique

Ian Kerridge^*, Cameron Stewart, Jackie Leach Scully, Mary Chiarella, Julie Hamblin, Adam Johnston, Christopher Ryan, Linda Sheahan, George Skowronski

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This column examines conscientious objection and institutional objection in Australian voluntary assistance in dying. It reviews the current legislative regimes and then examines these practices from an ethical perspective, and raises particular concerns and suggestions with how conscientious objection and institutional objection should be operationalised.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	806-821
Number of pages	16
Journal	Journal of Law and Medicine
Volume	30
Issue number	4
Publication status	Published - Dec 2023
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

voluntary assisted dying
conscientious objection
ethics
conscience

Access to Document

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38459874/

Cite this

@article{8c5bbaeb832b421d8dcb050f187ec775,

title = "Conscientious objection and institutional objection to voluntary assistance in dying: an ethico-legal critique",

abstract = "This column examines conscientious objection and institutional objection in Australian voluntary assistance in dying. It reviews the current legislative regimes and then examines these practices from an ethical perspective, and raises particular concerns and suggestions with how conscientious objection and institutional objection should be operationalised.",

keywords = "voluntary assisted dying, conscientious objection, ethics, conscience",

author = "Ian Kerridge and Cameron Stewart and Scully, {Jackie Leach} and Mary Chiarella and Julie Hamblin and Adam Johnston and Christopher Ryan and Linda Sheahan and George Skowronski",

year = "2023",

month = dec,

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "806--821",

journal = "Journal of Law and Medicine",

issn = "1320-159X",

publisher = "Lawbook Co.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conscientious objection and institutional objection to voluntary assistance in dying

T2 - an ethico-legal critique

AU - Kerridge, Ian

AU - Stewart, Cameron

AU - Scully, Jackie Leach

AU - Chiarella, Mary

AU - Hamblin, Julie

AU - Johnston, Adam

AU - Ryan, Christopher

AU - Sheahan, Linda

AU - Skowronski, George

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - This column examines conscientious objection and institutional objection in Australian voluntary assistance in dying. It reviews the current legislative regimes and then examines these practices from an ethical perspective, and raises particular concerns and suggestions with how conscientious objection and institutional objection should be operationalised.

AB - This column examines conscientious objection and institutional objection in Australian voluntary assistance in dying. It reviews the current legislative regimes and then examines these practices from an ethical perspective, and raises particular concerns and suggestions with how conscientious objection and institutional objection should be operationalised.

KW - voluntary assisted dying

KW - conscientious objection

KW - ethics

KW - conscience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187522803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SN - 1320-159X

VL - 30

SP - 806

EP - 821

JO - Journal of Law and Medicine

JF - Journal of Law and Medicine

IS - 4

ER -

Conscientious objection and institutional objection to voluntary assistance in dying: an ethico-legal critique

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this