TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus statement on the problem of terminology in psychological interventions using the internet or digital components
AU - Smoktunowicz, Ewelina
AU - Barak, Azy
AU - Andersson, Gerhard
AU - Banos, Rosa M.
AU - Berger, Thomas
AU - Botella, Cristina
AU - Dear, Blake F.
AU - Donker, Tara
AU - Ebert, David D.
AU - Hadjistavropoulos, Heather
AU - Hodgins, David C.
AU - Kaldo, Viktor
AU - Mohr, David C.
AU - Nordgreen, Tine
AU - Powers, Mark B.
AU - Riper, Heleen
AU - Ritterband, Lee M.
AU - Rozental, Alexander
AU - Schueller, Stephen M.
AU - Titov, Nickolai
AU - Weise, Cornelia
AU - Carlbring, Per
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Since the emergence of psychological interventions delivered via the Internet they have differed in numerous ways. The wealth of formats, methods, and technological solutions has led to increased availability and cost-effectiveness of clinical care, however, it has simultaneously generated a multitude of terms. With this paper, we first aim to establish whether a terminology issue exists in the field of Internet-delivered psychological interventions. If so, we aim to determine its implications for research, education, and practice. Furthermore, we intend to discuss solutions to mitigate the problem; in particular, we propose the concept of a common glossary. We invited 23 experts in the field of Internet-delivered interventions to respond to four questions, and employed the Delphi method to facilitate a discussion. We found that experts overwhelmingly agreed that there were terminological challenges, and that it had significant consequences for conducting research, treating patients, educating students, and informing the general public about Internet-delivered interventions. A cautious agreement has been reached that formulating a common glossary would be beneficial for the field to address the terminology issue. We end with recommendations for the possible formats of the glossary and means to disseminate it in a way that maximizes the probability of broad acceptance for a variety of stakeholders.
AB - Since the emergence of psychological interventions delivered via the Internet they have differed in numerous ways. The wealth of formats, methods, and technological solutions has led to increased availability and cost-effectiveness of clinical care, however, it has simultaneously generated a multitude of terms. With this paper, we first aim to establish whether a terminology issue exists in the field of Internet-delivered psychological interventions. If so, we aim to determine its implications for research, education, and practice. Furthermore, we intend to discuss solutions to mitigate the problem; in particular, we propose the concept of a common glossary. We invited 23 experts in the field of Internet-delivered interventions to respond to four questions, and employed the Delphi method to facilitate a discussion. We found that experts overwhelmingly agreed that there were terminological challenges, and that it had significant consequences for conducting research, treating patients, educating students, and informing the general public about Internet-delivered interventions. A cautious agreement has been reached that formulating a common glossary would be beneficial for the field to address the terminology issue. We end with recommendations for the possible formats of the glossary and means to disseminate it in a way that maximizes the probability of broad acceptance for a variety of stakeholders.
KW - internet-delivered interventions
KW - digital health
KW - terminology
KW - internet
KW - psychotherapy
KW - consensus statement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086504302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100331
DO - 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100331
M3 - Article
C2 - 32577404
AN - SCOPUS:85086504302
SN - 2214-7829
VL - 21
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Internet Interventions
JF - Internet Interventions
M1 - 100331
ER -