Conspiracy theories as serious play

Neil Levy*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Why do people endorse conspiracy theories? There is no single explanation: different people have different attitudes to the theories they say they believe. In this paper, I argue that for many, conspiracy theories are serious play. They're attracted to conspiracy theories because these theories are engaging: it's fun to entertain them (witness the enormous number of conspiracy narratives in film and TV). Just as the person who watches a conspiratorial film suspends disbelief for its duration, so many conspiracy theorists do not believe the theories they endorse; rather, they suspend disbelief in them. I argue that the serious play hypothesis explains some characteristic features of conspiracy theories, such as their gamification and the kind of relationship they have to evidence.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-19
    Number of pages19
    JournalPhilosophical Topics
    Volume50
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conspiracy theories as serious play'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this