Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Conspiracy thinking in American politics

Steven Gong, Davin Phoenix, George E. Marcus, Laiyla Santillan, Cailin O'Connor, Peter Ditto, Karen M. Douglas, Hemant Kakkar, David Kaye, Neil Levy, Lauren Ross, Mark Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Conspiratorial thinking is an indelible part of American politics; indeed, conspiracy theories proliferated in North America even before the founding of the United States. A current headwind of trends appears to facilitate a surge in conspiratorial thinking, including the increased spread and accessibility of misinformation, steady declines in public trust in authority figures, and an increasingly polarized electorate marked by mutual partisan animosity. The annual symposium of the UC Irvine Center for Neuropolitics brought together experts in law, political science, neuroscience, philosophy, and psychology to discuss why and how conspiracy thought develops and persists. This paper synthesizes the insights from that symposium, addressing the foundations of conspiracy thinking in both individuals and society as a whole, and its place in the current American political landscape. Through integrating various disciplinary perspectives, the symposium aimed to identify possible pathways to alleviating the prevalence and influence of conspiratorial thinking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-45
Number of pages18
JournalPolitics and the Life Sciences
Volume45
Issue number1
Early online date9 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2026. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • belief factions
  • moralization
  • cognition
  • misinformation
  • conspiratorial thinking
  • polarization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conspiracy thinking in American politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this