(C)onsumer focused (E)ducation on p(A)racetamol (S)ide (E)ffects, i(N)adequate (O)utcomes and (W)eaning (CEASE NOW) for individuals with low back pain: results of a feasibility study

Thomas Patterson, Justin Turner, Danijela Gnjidic, Barbara Mintzes, Carol Bennett, Lisa Bywaters, Ornella Clavisi, Melissa Baysari, Manuela Ferreira, Paula Beckenkamp, Paulo Ferreira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the feasibility of a patient-education booklet to support patients with low back pain (LBP) to reduce paracetamol intake. Design: Single group, repeated measures feasibility study. Setting: Community. Participants: Adults experiencing LBP of any kind and self-reporting consumption of paracetamol for LBP weekly for at least 1 month were invited to participate. Intervention: Participants received a patient-education booklet 1 week after the baseline measures were collected. The intervention was designed to change beliefs, increase knowledge and self-efficacy to deprescribe paracetamol for their LBP and create discussion with a health professional through the mechanisms of motivation, capacity and opportunity. Primary outcome measures: Feasibility of recruitment procedures, data collection and acceptability of the intervention. Secondary outcome measures: Changes in motivation, self-efficacy, opportunity to deprescribe paracetamol for their LBP, paracetamol usage and LBP clinical outcomes at baseline, 1-week and 1-month follow-up. Results: A total of 24 participants were recruited into the study within the timeframe of 3 months from study advertisement and all completed the study follow-up. There were no missing data for any outcome measure across all follow-up points, 22 (91.6%) participants were willing to participate in a future randomised control trial (RCT) and over 60% of participants responded positively to questions regarding acceptability of the patient-educational booklet. Overall, at the 1-month follow-up, approximately two thirds (15/24) of participants had an increase in motivation and self-efficacy scores and had discussed or intended to discuss their paracetamol use for LBP with a health professional. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that the patient-education booklet is feasible to implement, and both the intervention and study design were well-received by participants. This study supports the undertaking an RCT to assess the effects of the patient-education booklet on deprescribing paracetamol in people with LBP.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere068164
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalBMJ Open
Volume12
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '(C)onsumer focused (E)ducation on p(A)racetamol (S)ide (E)ffects, i(N)adequate (O)utcomes and (W)eaning (CEASE NOW) for individuals with low back pain: results of a feasibility study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this