Contact status and finding a job: validation and extension

Nan Lin, Hang Young Lee, Dan Ao

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Research on the use of social relations and resources embedded in social relations (social capital) in the labor market has had a long tradition in both economics and sociology (Granovetter 1995; Lin 1999b). A major focus has been the utility of contacts in job searches. The accumulated evidence over a period of four decades has confi rmed two general fi ndings. First, the mere use of contacts in the job search does not show any advantage in job attainment (e.g., occupational status or income; see Elliott 2000; Green, Tigges and Diaz 1999; Lin 1999b; S. Smith 2000). Second, among those who use contacts, contact status as a measure of social capital has consistently shown some advantage in obtaining better jobs, after controlling for education and other relevant demographic variables (Bian and Ang 1997; De Graaf and Flap 1988; Ensel 1979; Marsden and Hurlbert 1988; Lin, Ensel and Vaughn 1981; Requena 1991; Volker and Flap 1999; Wegener 1991). This second fi nding, however, has been challenged for its validity (nonspuriousness). Mouw (2003) suspected that contact status may be spurious in its eff ect in part because of occupational homophily (similarity of occupations between the job seeker and the contact), considered a social preference for friendship rather than social infl uence.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationSocial capital and its institutional contingency
Subtitle of host publicationa study of the United States, China and Taiwan
EditorsNan Lin, Yang-chih Fu, Chih-jou Jay Chen
Place of PublicationNew York ; London
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Pages21-41
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9780203749425
ISBN (Print)9780415899611
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameRoutledge advances in sociology
PublisherRoutledge
Volume108

Fingerprint

contact
job search
Social Relations
social capital
job seeker
occupational status
friendship
occupation
sociology
labor market
income
resources
evidence
economics
education

Cite this

Lin, N., Lee, H. Y., & Ao, D. (2014). Contact status and finding a job: validation and extension. In N. Lin, Y. Fu, & C. J. Chen (Eds.), Social capital and its institutional contingency: a study of the United States, China and Taiwan (pp. 21-41). (Routledge advances in sociology; Vol. 108). New York ; London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Lin, Nan ; Lee, Hang Young ; Ao, Dan. / Contact status and finding a job : validation and extension. Social capital and its institutional contingency: a study of the United States, China and Taiwan. editor / Nan Lin ; Yang-chih Fu ; Chih-jou Jay Chen. New York ; London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2014. pp. 21-41 (Routledge advances in sociology).
@inbook{abf4a86af03d4a70bd2a9402caf48b8a,
title = "Contact status and finding a job: validation and extension",
abstract = "Research on the use of social relations and resources embedded in social relations (social capital) in the labor market has had a long tradition in both economics and sociology (Granovetter 1995; Lin 1999b). A major focus has been the utility of contacts in job searches. The accumulated evidence over a period of four decades has confi rmed two general fi ndings. First, the mere use of contacts in the job search does not show any advantage in job attainment (e.g., occupational status or income; see Elliott 2000; Green, Tigges and Diaz 1999; Lin 1999b; S. Smith 2000). Second, among those who use contacts, contact status as a measure of social capital has consistently shown some advantage in obtaining better jobs, after controlling for education and other relevant demographic variables (Bian and Ang 1997; De Graaf and Flap 1988; Ensel 1979; Marsden and Hurlbert 1988; Lin, Ensel and Vaughn 1981; Requena 1991; Volker and Flap 1999; Wegener 1991). This second fi nding, however, has been challenged for its validity (nonspuriousness). Mouw (2003) suspected that contact status may be spurious in its eff ect in part because of occupational homophily (similarity of occupations between the job seeker and the contact), considered a social preference for friendship rather than social infl uence.",
author = "Nan Lin and Lee, {Hang Young} and Dan Ao",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415899611",
series = "Routledge advances in sociology",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
pages = "21--41",
editor = "Nan Lin and Yang-chih Fu and Chen, {Chih-jou Jay}",
booktitle = "Social capital and its institutional contingency",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Lin, N, Lee, HY & Ao, D 2014, Contact status and finding a job: validation and extension. in N Lin, Y Fu & CJ Chen (eds), Social capital and its institutional contingency: a study of the United States, China and Taiwan. Routledge advances in sociology, vol. 108, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, New York ; London, pp. 21-41.

Contact status and finding a job : validation and extension. / Lin, Nan; Lee, Hang Young; Ao, Dan.

Social capital and its institutional contingency: a study of the United States, China and Taiwan. ed. / Nan Lin; Yang-chih Fu; Chih-jou Jay Chen. New York ; London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2014. p. 21-41 (Routledge advances in sociology; Vol. 108).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Contact status and finding a job

T2 - validation and extension

AU - Lin,Nan

AU - Lee,Hang Young

AU - Ao,Dan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Research on the use of social relations and resources embedded in social relations (social capital) in the labor market has had a long tradition in both economics and sociology (Granovetter 1995; Lin 1999b). A major focus has been the utility of contacts in job searches. The accumulated evidence over a period of four decades has confi rmed two general fi ndings. First, the mere use of contacts in the job search does not show any advantage in job attainment (e.g., occupational status or income; see Elliott 2000; Green, Tigges and Diaz 1999; Lin 1999b; S. Smith 2000). Second, among those who use contacts, contact status as a measure of social capital has consistently shown some advantage in obtaining better jobs, after controlling for education and other relevant demographic variables (Bian and Ang 1997; De Graaf and Flap 1988; Ensel 1979; Marsden and Hurlbert 1988; Lin, Ensel and Vaughn 1981; Requena 1991; Volker and Flap 1999; Wegener 1991). This second fi nding, however, has been challenged for its validity (nonspuriousness). Mouw (2003) suspected that contact status may be spurious in its eff ect in part because of occupational homophily (similarity of occupations between the job seeker and the contact), considered a social preference for friendship rather than social infl uence.

AB - Research on the use of social relations and resources embedded in social relations (social capital) in the labor market has had a long tradition in both economics and sociology (Granovetter 1995; Lin 1999b). A major focus has been the utility of contacts in job searches. The accumulated evidence over a period of four decades has confi rmed two general fi ndings. First, the mere use of contacts in the job search does not show any advantage in job attainment (e.g., occupational status or income; see Elliott 2000; Green, Tigges and Diaz 1999; Lin 1999b; S. Smith 2000). Second, among those who use contacts, contact status as a measure of social capital has consistently shown some advantage in obtaining better jobs, after controlling for education and other relevant demographic variables (Bian and Ang 1997; De Graaf and Flap 1988; Ensel 1979; Marsden and Hurlbert 1988; Lin, Ensel and Vaughn 1981; Requena 1991; Volker and Flap 1999; Wegener 1991). This second fi nding, however, has been challenged for its validity (nonspuriousness). Mouw (2003) suspected that contact status may be spurious in its eff ect in part because of occupational homophily (similarity of occupations between the job seeker and the contact), considered a social preference for friendship rather than social infl uence.

UR - https://www.routledge.com/Social-Capital-and-Its-Institutional-Contingency-A-Study-of-the-United/Lin-Fu-Chen/p/book/9780415899611

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780415899611

T3 - Routledge advances in sociology

SP - 21

EP - 41

BT - Social capital and its institutional contingency

PB - Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group

CY - New York ; London

ER -

Lin N, Lee HY, Ao D. Contact status and finding a job: validation and extension. In Lin N, Fu Y, Chen CJ, editors, Social capital and its institutional contingency: a study of the United States, China and Taiwan. New York ; London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. 2014. p. 21-41. (Routledge advances in sociology).