Abstract
Context has long been regarded as an important element of long-term memory, and episodic memory in particular. The ability to remember not only the object or focus of a memory but also contextual details allow us to reconstruct integrated representations of events. However, despite its prevalence in the memory literature, context remains difficult to define and identify, with different studies using context to refer to different sets of stimuli or concepts. These varying definitions of context have not prevented it from being a key element of many models of memory. Within these models, context is usually explicitly encoded as an element of an event and processed through different neural pathways to other elements of the event, such as objects. Here we challenge the notion that context in memory is encoded. We offer an alternative where context in memory takes a variety of forms depending on the question being asked. We propose events are simply encoded, but the focus of retrieval (object) and context are not defined until recall.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 105934 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews |
| Volume | 167 |
| Early online date | 28 Oct 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Context
- Episodic memory
- Hippocampus
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Context in memory is reconstructed, not encoded'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver