Continuing commentary: shaking the bedrock

Lisa Bortolotti

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper, I articulate the thesis that most delusional beliefs are continuous with other irrational beliefs. Any interpreter with some knowledge about the cognitive and affective life of subjects with delusions can at least partially understand their reports, and explain and predict their behavior in intentional terms. I identify similarities and differences between this approach to the nature of delusions and the approach adopted by Rhodes and Gipps, who have recently defended the view that people with delusions do not share the same bedrock beliefs as people without (the Background Theory of Delusions).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)77-87
    Number of pages11
    JournalPhilosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology
    Volume18
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • belief
    • delusion
    • rationality
    • self-knowledge
    • bedrock
    • cognitive-behavioral therapy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Continuing commentary: shaking the bedrock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this